300ZX (Z31) Forums Dedicated to 84-89 ZCars otherwize known as the Z31's

my good luck

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-07-2006, 06:02 PM
  #51  
Registered User
 
numb1300z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 24
ummm. Anytime twin turbos are used one smaller turbo is used 4 bottom end because the smaller the turbo the quicker it spolls. And the second will be the larger turbo for the top end.

But by all means correct me if im wrong.
numb1300z is offline  
Old 03-07-2006, 07:03 PM
  #52  
Registered User
 
jfairladyz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Temecula, CA
Posts: 5,485
Not all setups use a small and a large turbo though. The Supra and Skyline both use two small turbo's of the same size. The RX7 (FD) however used a small and large turbo. But the reasons for using two different sized turbos have been taken cared of, same for twin turbos. Turbos are now very efficient, especially the ball bearing types. Turbine and compressor wheels have advanced phenomonally as have housing design. Ah hell, everything about modern day turbochargers has improved upon older designs. So you can get the quick spool up and still have the top end all from one turbo. Twin turbo's on an inline motor just no longer make sense. But in the case of a V layout twins makes more sense since you cant place the turbo optimally near all the exhaust ports. So you can put one on each side, like the Z32TT. Which by the way uses two same sized turbos.

In the case of sequintial turbocharging (one small, one large), YES, it is designed for what you described. But with todays turbos there's just no need to go with twins unless you have a V layout, and even then it's not all that neccessary. There are kits being manufactured for cars that places the turbo all the way back by the muffler And they supposedly still have minimal lag and excellent top end.
jfairladyz is offline  
Old 03-07-2006, 07:36 PM
  #53  
Registered User
 
craZed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: riverveiw,fl
Posts: 102
^ Well put. But,you are mistaken, the supra uses a sequential set up.

Now lets try to get back to the main focus of this thread.
craZed is offline  
Old 03-08-2006, 09:19 AM
  #54  
Registered User
 
AZ-ZBum's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Phoenix, Arizona
Posts: 1,396
Originally Posted by numb1300z
ummm. Anytime twin turbos are used one smaller turbo is used 4 bottom end because the smaller the turbo the quicker it spolls. And the second will be the larger turbo for the top end.

But by all means correct me if im wrong.
Was the word "FOR" really that difficult to spell out?

And yes. You are wrong. Most dual turbo setups were same sized turbos. Supra, Z32, Skyline, Porsche 911, etc. I can only think of the RX7s were different sized turbos were used. I know there must be others, but that's the only one I can think of right now.
Originally Posted by craZed
^ Well put. But,you are mistaken, the supra uses a sequential set up.

Now lets try to get back to the main focus of this thread.
No it doesn't. They use two same sized turbos as well. Each turbo is fed by 3 cylinders.
AZ-ZBum is offline  
Old 03-08-2006, 07:13 PM
  #55  
Registered User
 
numb1300z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 24
Originally Posted by AZ-ZBum
Was the word "FOR" really that difficult to spell out?

And yes. You are wrong. Most dual turbo setups were same sized turbos. Supra, Z32, Skyline, Porsche 911, etc. I can only think of the RX7s were different sized turbos were used. I know there must be others, but that's the only one I can think of right now.

No it doesn't. They use two same sized turbos as well. Each turbo is fed by 3 cylinders.

You might be right AZBum but isnt the basic idea to have two turbos for reduced spool times because two smaller turbos can spool faster than one large one.
numb1300z is offline  
Old 03-08-2006, 08:09 PM
  #56  
Registered User
 
jfairladyz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Temecula, CA
Posts: 5,485
But what you have to remember when using two smaller turbos is that it is proportional. See instead of having 6 cylinders spooling one small/medium size turbo you now only have 3 each spooling a slightly smaller turbo. I'd say twins are actually more beneficial for the top end then they are for the bottom end of the power band. Think about it, if you have one small/medium sized turbo you're still going to get excellent spool up cause you've got 6 cylinders spooling it. But that turbo can still only push out so much air in the end. Now take two smaller turbos. With only 3 cylinders spooling them they're not going to spool up super quick. It's going to be about the same if not unnoticeably worse then the slightly larger turbo. But now you get to combine the air flow outputs of those two small turbos. Now if you add those two airflow totals up you end up with a couple of small turbos pushing more air at the top end then that single turbo and you still get to MAINTAIN the lower end response. So you see, twin turbos isn't about better bottom end response. It's about maintaining that response while allowing for a slight increase in the top end. But this whole set up is VERY limited which is why you traditionally see it tossed in favor of a single turbo in high horsepower applications. Think about it, if you slapped two large turbos on an engine then you'd never be able to spool them.

Twins make sense for OEM's looking for a slight boost in power without hurting driveability. 2 small turbos will NOT spool faster than a properly sized single turbo. PERIOD. Of course now adays you can slap to small turbos on a V layout and still hit upwards of 500HP while still mainaining the bottom end. Of course, you can do the same with a single turbo on an inline motor. Then you gotta factor in the extra weight of twins. Not that huge of a deal, but if you could get the job done just as well with a single turbo wouldn't you take the weight savings? Not to mention the savings in cost?

And to justify all of this it does tie into helping you decide what to do with your car Crazed

Last edited by jfairladyz; 03-08-2006 at 08:12 PM.
jfairladyz is offline  
Old 03-09-2006, 11:57 AM
  #57  
Registered User
 
AZ-ZBum's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Phoenix, Arizona
Posts: 1,396
Originally Posted by numb1300z
You might be right AZBum but isnt the basic idea to have two turbos for reduced spool times because two smaller turbos can spool faster than one large one.
Holy CRAP! It's as if you didn't read anything posted above. Let me copy it for you (as well as you should read jfairladyz's detailed responce).
Originally Posted by AZ-ZBum
On the same size engine, of course you would. But you're missing the point. You're now comparing two 1.5L engines each running a small turbo to one bigger 3.0L engine running a bigger turbo, there are more variables.
AZ-ZBum is offline  
Old 03-09-2006, 06:22 PM
  #58  
Registered User
 
numb1300z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 24
Yes I understood what he said But I didnt belive spool times were based on amount of cilinders as much as the size of the spinning thing inside the turbo. Bigger turbo=slower spooling. Smaller turbo=quicker spools.
numb1300z is offline  
Old 03-09-2006, 07:26 PM
  #59  
Registered User
 
jfairladyz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Temecula, CA
Posts: 5,485
But what spins that
spinning thing inside the turbo
? Exhaust Gas. The more air fuel you burn the more exhaust you'll have. Now as AZ-ZBum said, when you split the turbos so they are fed by 3 cylinders each you now only have 1.5 litters feeding each turbo as opposed to 3.0 liters feeding one. The 3.0 liter is burning twice as much air/fuel and pushing twice as much exhaust through that one turbo then the 1.5 liters to each smaller turbo. Exhaust is the ONLY thing that spins those turbine wheels. Without it the turbine doesn't spin. So it would make sense that unless those two small turbos are each LESS than half the size of the one turbo then they are NOT going to spool faster. Now a T3 turbo can flow quite a bit of air and a T3/T4 hybrid can flow enough for any street vehicle. You'll be hard pressed to find a turbo half the size of those let alone even smaller than half the size. Of course this is not exact and there are variables but thats the gist of it. But if they are only half the size of the bigger turbo then they're not only going to only spool as fast as the one turbo but they also will only be able to flow the same amount of air on the top end as well. So two SLIGHTLY smaller turbos will put out more air at the top end and will most likely spool just slightly slower than a slightly larger single turbo.

Twins isn't about the spool up, it's about the top end. They are, for the last time, only meant to PRESERVE spool up.

Last edited by jfairladyz; 03-09-2006 at 07:29 PM.
jfairladyz is offline  
Old 03-10-2006, 08:13 AM
  #60  
Registered User
 
numb1300z's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 24
No. Not what powers the turbo but the screw inside. I thought spool times were based on the effincey and size of the screw inside.

And the term screw comes from superchargers, I dont know what it is called on a turbo.
numb1300z is offline  
Old 03-10-2006, 09:50 AM
  #61  
The Good Twin
 
NismoPick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Wild Wild West, UTAH!
Posts: 20,639
Originally Posted by numb1300z
No. Not what powers the turbo but the screw inside. I thought spool times were based on the effincey and size of the screw inside.
There are several things that affect the turbo performance.... You should read the book "MAXIMUM BOOST" by Corky Bell.

Originally Posted by numb1300z
And the term screw comes from superchargers, I dont know what it is called on a turbo.
Turbine... compressor... fan... wheel.... it has lots o names.
NismoPick is offline  
Old 03-10-2006, 06:23 PM
  #62  
Registered User
 
jfairladyz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Temecula, CA
Posts: 5,485
Originally Posted by numb1300z
No. Not what powers the turbo but the screw inside. I thought spool times were based on the effincey and size of the screw inside.

And the term screw comes from superchargers, I dont know what it is called on a turbo.
Turbine wheel would be the most common term. But yeah the size of the wheel and housing does make the difference. But that's what I've been trying to explain with the size of the turbo. When I said size, those were the things I was referencing.
jfairladyz is offline  
Old 03-10-2006, 07:09 PM
  #63  
Registered User
 
AZ-ZBum's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Phoenix, Arizona
Posts: 1,396
Originally Posted by numb1300z
Yes I understood what he said But I didnt belive spool times were based on amount of cilinders as much as the size of the spinning thing inside the turbo. Bigger turbo=slower spooling. Smaller turbo=quicker spools.
On the same size engine, absolutely. On different sized engines, not even close.

i.e. a 1.0L engine will not spool a T25 as fast as a 3.0L engine will spool a T3.

Originally Posted by numb1300z
No. Not what powers the turbo but the screw inside. I thought spool times were based on the effincey and size of the screw inside.

And the term screw comes from superchargers, I dont know what it is called on a turbo.
A turbo is fed by exhaust gases. The amount of gas exiting the engine is what feeds the turbo. A 1.5L motor has half the available air to feed the turbo than a 3.0L motor.

The biggest factors in the spool time of the turbo is the size of the turbo and the size of the engine feeding it.

When you run twin turbos, you are essentially halving the amount of air available to spin each turbo.

The size of the engine is essential to the spooling of a turbo.

i.e. You would NEVER put a T25 or even a single T3 on a 5.7L V8. It would kill the turbo in no time.

Likewise, you'd NEVER want to put a T78 on a 1.5L Geo. You'd never spool up.

Last edited by AZ-ZBum; 03-10-2006 at 07:14 PM.
AZ-ZBum is offline  
Old 03-10-2006, 10:32 PM
  #64  
Registered User
 
jfairladyz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Temecula, CA
Posts: 5,485
It's all yours. I give up

Didn't somebody need help spending $20k?
jfairladyz is offline  
Old 03-14-2006, 06:19 PM
  #65  
Registered User
 
DriftekZ31's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Chesapeake, VA
Posts: 19
Originally Posted by Sp4rt4n
Well, I believe AZ-ZBum is the only one who made any comments that may have upset you, but hes like that sometimes

We all just learn to get used to him


First thing first this guy deserves the
of the year award....


Sometimes? He's a complete dick with internet hostility and ***** envy issues....
I have not seen one post from this guy that was anything than to try to one-up someone else or to degrade something someone else said....

You can be a walking dictionary of Z information and have Z factory service manuals memorized and whatever else you guys think he's a god of Z's for, but its useless when your trying to find a decent source of information.....Answer a question and dont emply that your the smartest guy ever and then someone will respect you....

No-one likes a know it all, especially a smart ***, one-up, know it all....

Dont mind him man hes just revered as a god by all the others that are too afraid to tell him hes a *****.....

That is all.......
DriftekZ31 is offline  
Old 03-14-2006, 07:08 PM
  #66  
The Cake Is A Lie!
 
entropy31's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: WA
Posts: 5,690
oh, we remind him on a regular basis that he is a *****, and he is fully comfortable with that fact. he does bring up good points quite a bit. he is;nt afraid to tell someone when they are acting like an idiot. i'm glad we have zbum around here.
entropy31 is offline  
Old 03-14-2006, 07:11 PM
  #67  
Registered User
 
DriftekZ31's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Chesapeake, VA
Posts: 19
Originally Posted by entropy31
oh, we remind him on a regular basis that he is a *****, and he is fully comfortable with that fact. he does bring up good points quite a bit. he is;nt afraid to tell someone when they are acting like an idiot. i'm glad we have zbum around here.
Cronnies.....
DriftekZ31 is offline  
Old 03-14-2006, 07:17 PM
  #68  
Registered User
 
jfairladyz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Temecula, CA
Posts: 5,485
Hey thats not a bad idea. The first ever ZDriver awards. In addition to the catergory mentioned above we could have catergories like: Most helpful, Least Helpful, Post *****, Friendliest Member, Strangest Member, Most Obsesive Member. I mean the list goes on. Alright I'm going to stop jacking this thread now. I swear
jfairladyz is offline  
Old 03-14-2006, 07:23 PM
  #69  
Registered User
 
AZ-ZBum's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Phoenix, Arizona
Posts: 1,396
Originally Posted by DriftekZ31
First thing first this guy deserves the
of the year award....


Sometimes? He's a complete dick with internet hostility and ***** envy issues....
I have not seen one post from this guy that was anything than to try to one-up someone else or to degrade something someone else said....

You can be a walking dictionary of Z information and have Z factory service manuals memorized and whatever else you guys think he's a god of Z's for, but its useless when your trying to find a decent source of information.....Answer a question and dont emply that your the smartest guy ever and then someone will respect you....

No-one likes a know it all, especially a smart ***, one-up, know it all....

Dont mind him man hes just revered as a god by all the others that are too afraid to tell him hes a *****.....

That is all.......
Why thank you very much! I will always cherish this award.

Are you still pissed off that you can't advertize your shop in your signature on 300zxclub? Or is it that I pointed out you didn't read the rules about it? Or the fact that I responded to your responce about the "warm welcome"? Hell dude, I was even nice about telling you that you weren't allowed to do that.

BTW: As soon as they fix the avatar selection thing, this is going to be my new avatar:

Thanks!
AZ-ZBum is offline  
Old 03-14-2006, 07:39 PM
  #70  
Registered User
 
DriftekZ31's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Chesapeake, VA
Posts: 19
Originally Posted by AZ-ZBum
Why thank you very much! I will always cherish this award.

Are you still pissed off that you can't advertize your shop in your signature on 300zxclub? Or is it that I pointed out you didn't read the rules about it? Or the fact that I responded to your responce about the "warm welcome"? Hell dude, I was even nice about telling you that you weren't allowed to do that.

BTW: As soon as they fix the avatar selection thing, this is going to be my new avatar:

Thanks!

Nah im just enjoying calling you a *****...... I kinda relate with you, i think its a conflict of personality (The same) We'd prolly be great friends in the real world....

The shop doesnt need advertisement i just put it in all my sigs.... Just kind of found it rediculous i specialize in S chassis cars and you thought it was a conflict of interest, but none the less i agree with your point of view, if everyone else has to pay or whatever why should you bend the rules for me.... Bad mood had me going that day........

But: the entire post was about all I read that you post being a complete *** to everyone you come across....

Who cares its the NET and it gives me something to do....We can be like the redskins, cowboys rivalry if you want, might spice up the forum.....
DriftekZ31 is offline  
Old 03-14-2006, 07:46 PM
  #71  
Registered User
 
AZ-ZBum's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Phoenix, Arizona
Posts: 1,396
Actually, AMZPerformance is also an S chassis shop.

I'm not a complete *** to everyone. Just the lazy people. Which the NET seems to attract in vast numbers.
AZ-ZBum is offline  
Old 03-14-2006, 07:48 PM
  #72  
Registered User
 
DriftekZ31's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Chesapeake, VA
Posts: 19
Originally Posted by AZ-ZBum
Actually, AMZPerformance is also an S chassis shop.

I'm not a complete *** to everyone. Just the lazy people. Which the NET seems to attract in vast numbers.

I must be lazy...... Fair trade, i'll be lazy you be the asshat....

Wanna make me a lazy hat picture?

That was a joke, im trying to get along with you here!
DriftekZ31 is offline  
Old 03-14-2006, 07:50 PM
  #73  
The Cake Is A Lie!
 
entropy31's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: WA
Posts: 5,690
ok. all done. no more of this. CLOSED.
entropy31 is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
skittle
280ZX (S130) Forums
16
09-26-2006 08:36 PM
VegasEdge
Vegas 350Z Club
4
11-21-2005 02:15 AM
RodMoyes
280ZX Appearance Exterior, Interior
4
06-14-2005 03:11 PM
b300z
The Lounge (Off Topic)
22
10-29-2004 12:53 PM
b300z
The Lounge (Off Topic)
34
10-08-2004 04:13 PM



Quick Reply: my good luck



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 11:55 AM.