MS/PS cars
10-01-2006, 03:12 PM
#26
Über User
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: lemont, Illinois
Posts: 9,532
i plan on judging my kids when i havfe them.....and in races i the tt was faster in the quarter mile...now its still probably faster...i watched the z33 has some like 14.2 flat quarter i think...close to that...the TT has a 13.7.....or soemthign like that...but not only that but for supporting mods power per dollar.....TT will win there to....
oh yeah and i was joking about judging my kids...lol
oh yeah and i was joking about judging my kids...lol
10-02-2006, 09:33 AM
#28
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Temecula, CA
Posts: 5,485
I was only trying to point out that "wimpy" was not an accurate way of describing the 350Z.
http://www.sportcompactcarweb.com/fe...rbo/index.html
http://www.sportcompactcarweb.com/fe...50z/index.html
Those 1/4 times for that Z33 are from the lower powered '03 model.
It's the snobby* 350Z drivers that deserve the title, not the car itself.
(It should be noted that this label does not apply to all Z33 drivers, but rather to the ones that have earned this title.)
http://www.sportcompactcarweb.com/fe...rbo/index.html
http://www.sportcompactcarweb.com/fe...50z/index.html
Those 1/4 times for that Z33 are from the lower powered '03 model.
It's the snobby* 350Z drivers that deserve the title, not the car itself.
(It should be noted that this label does not apply to all Z33 drivers, but rather to the ones that have earned this title.)
10-02-2006, 09:39 AM
#29
Pro Pumpkin Carver
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Oakland Cali-****en-fornia
Posts: 2,160
Originally Posted by jfairladyz
It's the snobby* 350Z drivers that deserve the title, not the car itself (It should be noted that this label does not apply to all Z33 drivers, but rather to the ones that have earned this title.)
S30>s130>z32>z33>z31
10-02-2006, 10:43 AM
#31
confuzed member
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Salinas, CA
Posts: 3,074
Originally Posted by jfairladyz
Sure the original Z33 wasn't the quickest Z...but the '06 not only makes as much power as a stock Z32TT it's also a couple hundered pounds lighter then the Z32TT. On top of that the less powerful '03 model was only a hair slower then the Z32TT...where do you think that puts the more powerful '06 model? I dont think that qualifies as wimpy.
And come on, rating Z's is like putting your kids in order of which you like most...it aint right
And come on, rating Z's is like putting your kids in order of which you like most...it aint right
10-02-2006, 01:00 PM
#32
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Temecula, CA
Posts: 5,485
Originally Posted by emo236
Who buys a Z32TT and keeps it stock. Stage three would eat ANY Z33 alive! I raced a Z33 with a Stillen SC and ate it alive in the 1/8 mi. Heck, the NOS powered NA with us went back and forth with the same Z33.
nobody called the S30 wimpy. Nobody called the S130 wimpy. And nobody called the Z31 wimpy. Now in actual performance where does the Z33 rank with those cars? That is my point. How does the second quickest factory Z of all time qualify as wimpy? Theres no arguing that the Z32 TT sits atop the performance totem pole in the Z world. It's a super car in a family of sport and GT cars. Of course as it sits, it wouldn't take much for an improved factory Z33 (or the next generation Z) to have the potential to knock the Z32 out of that spot in the future.
Last edited by jfairladyz; 10-02-2006 at 01:04 PM.
10-02-2006, 02:06 PM
#33
More Than Meets The Eye
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Mesa, Az
Posts: 5,120
S130, S30, Z31, Z32, Z33, there is list of best to last.(my taste)
Or...280zx, 240-280z, 300zx, 300zx z32, 350z
And the problem with the 350z's, is not just the owners, but the fact they look like other cars on the road. Like the Infiniti, almost the same, it is just more luxurious. I have seen both the 350z, and the Infiniti, up close. Almost the same in body style. And the track times, still don't mean squat to me. I know the 280zx, is not the fastest car out there. But it is more than what you can beat. The looks blow most cars away, and there is just something about the 280zx. That I love, and always have, and it is hard to put in words.
Or...280zx, 240-280z, 300zx, 300zx z32, 350z
And the problem with the 350z's, is not just the owners, but the fact they look like other cars on the road. Like the Infiniti, almost the same, it is just more luxurious. I have seen both the 350z, and the Infiniti, up close. Almost the same in body style. And the track times, still don't mean squat to me. I know the 280zx, is not the fastest car out there. But it is more than what you can beat. The looks blow most cars away, and there is just something about the 280zx. That I love, and always have, and it is hard to put in words.
10-02-2006, 04:49 PM
#34
confuzed member
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Salinas, CA
Posts: 3,074
Originally Posted by jfairladyz
still missing my point
nobody called the S30 wimpy. Nobody called the S130 wimpy. And nobody called the Z31 wimpy. Now in actual performance where does the Z33 rank with those cars? That is my point. How does the second quickest factory Z of all time qualify as wimpy? Theres no arguing that the Z32 TT sits atop the performance totem pole in the Z world. It's a super car in a family of sport and GT cars. Of course as it sits, it wouldn't take much for an improved factory Z33 (or the next generation Z) to have the potential to knock the Z32 out of that spot in the future.
nobody called the S30 wimpy. Nobody called the S130 wimpy. And nobody called the Z31 wimpy. Now in actual performance where does the Z33 rank with those cars? That is my point. How does the second quickest factory Z of all time qualify as wimpy? Theres no arguing that the Z32 TT sits atop the performance totem pole in the Z world. It's a super car in a family of sport and GT cars. Of course as it sits, it wouldn't take much for an improved factory Z33 (or the next generation Z) to have the potential to knock the Z32 out of that spot in the future.
10-02-2006, 06:26 PM
#35
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Temecula, CA
Posts: 5,485
Originally Posted by emo236
still not a good point...haha.
Performance wise I'll rate my top 5:
1. Z32 TT
2. Z33
3. Z32 (non-turbo)
4. Z31 turbo
5. S130 turbo
Looks wise I'll rate them as so:
79-81 S130 slicktop 2 seater
70-74 S30
Z32 (first the later models, then the earlier models. inc. 2+2)
S130 (the rest of the 2 seaters)
late Z31 (2 seater)
early Z31 (2 seater)
75+ S30 (2 seater)
All remaining 2+2's.
All the above is based on factory stock vehicles.
10-03-2006, 12:44 AM
#36
confuzed member
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Salinas, CA
Posts: 3,074
Originally Posted by jfairladyz
yeah, but neither is saying a Stage 3 will stomp all over a SC 350Z at 4 lbs of boost...haha. Whats that prove? The Z33 isn't a super car? We already know that. A 350HP Z33 cant keep up with a 450+HP Z32? Common sense.
Performance wise I'll rate my top 5:
1. Z32 TT
2. Z33
3. Z32 (non-turbo)
4. Z31 turbo
5. S130 turbo
Looks wise I'll rate them as so:
79-81 S130 slicktop 2 seater
70-74 S30
Z32 (first the later models, then the earlier models. inc. 2+2)
S130 (the rest of the 2 seaters)
late Z31 (2 seater)
early Z31 (2 seater)
75+ S30 (2 seater)
All remaining 2+2's.
All the above is based on factory stock vehicles.
Performance wise I'll rate my top 5:
1. Z32 TT
2. Z33
3. Z32 (non-turbo)
4. Z31 turbo
5. S130 turbo
Looks wise I'll rate them as so:
79-81 S130 slicktop 2 seater
70-74 S30
Z32 (first the later models, then the earlier models. inc. 2+2)
S130 (the rest of the 2 seaters)
late Z31 (2 seater)
early Z31 (2 seater)
75+ S30 (2 seater)
All remaining 2+2's.
All the above is based on factory stock vehicles.
10-03-2006, 03:55 AM
#37
Sept Z of the month
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Ansbach, Germany
Posts: 243
I am really partial to my baby. But I do love the lines on the oldy but goodies.
And are we talking wheels or flywheel hp up there? Flywheel would make emo correct with 415 TOPS. (But that would still beat a Z33 anyday of the week)
<----Stage 8 or something
And are we talking wheels or flywheel hp up there? Flywheel would make emo correct with 415 TOPS. (But that would still beat a Z33 anyday of the week)
<----Stage 8 or something
Last edited by js9krcr01040; 10-03-2006 at 03:58 AM.
10-03-2006, 03:05 PM
#39
confuzed member
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Salinas, CA
Posts: 3,074
As you can read in my thread above...I'm talking flywheel....at the wheels, a stg III is going to be WAY under 415hp! That's where power transfer differs so much. A 450hp+ StgIII TT would be amazing! I wish I could spend $2K and have a 450+rwhp TT! That would be amazing! I have upgraded fuel, turbos, etc etc and I don't think I'm at 450rwhp!
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Bookmarks
