300zx TT Axis Hiros???
#1
300zx TT Axis Hiros???
I searched for over an hour last night to see if anyone has tried to put Axis Hiros on the Z32. Here's what I want to do. I want to put 18 x 8.5 on the front. To do this I would need spacers. Spacers are somewhat controversial on this forum, but I have a friend who put installed spacers on his TT with Axis Mod Sevens and has no problems. The rear wheels I want to put on are 19 x 10.5, but I think they may be to big. Axis reccomended that I put on 19 x 8.5 and 19 x 9.5. I don't mind going 19 X 9.5 in the back, but I refuse to put a 19 inch wheel on the front. Any help or Ideas would be much apprieciated. Thanks
#2
19s are too big. Not only will they likely cause rubbing issues (and your car will sit like an SUV), but it'll have so much rotational mass that it will make your 300ZX slower.
Go 18" all around if you're really set on larger wheels. Spacers are ok as long as you don't go too large with them (the largest I'd recommend are 15mm).
Go 18" all around if you're really set on larger wheels. Spacers are ok as long as you don't go too large with them (the largest I'd recommend are 15mm).
#3
8.5 you shouldnt need spacers, nither should you for 9.5 really... just get the proper offset. i had 9 inch wide rims all around on my car had no problems. and i would honestly say go 17 because you can get more tire on them, just perform better and look better imho.
#9
Originally Posted by snwbrderphat540
volk, racing heart.... idk... those are my fav for 5 lug.
(I'll be getting some 5zgien FN01R-Cs someday... super lightweight and look awesome)
But seriously, if you really want those wheels, get them... it's your money and your car. We're just providing input for the best possible performing 300ZX.
#11
with todays tire technology
the differnce between 17" and 18" are minimal, 19" look a bit silly on the z cuase you have to use 20 series or under tires to keep them from rubbing, and at such a low profile you can not get the performance out of the z you would expect for such a car. 17" probably help you accelerate a bit faster with less rotaional mass but you have something like 28% smaller contact patch to the road so perhaps the 18s make up in traction what the 17 make up for in weight. Maybe not but they probably help you to stop a bit shorter distances. We aren't talking 20 feet or anything but perhaps a good 3-5 feet in 60-0 stoppig distances ( i am talking same make/model of tire but different sizing 17vs18s) on the same car on the same track. But you lose this when you go to ultra low profile cause the tire will not handle road inconsistances or dissipate heat as well. So, to sum up, go with 17s or 18s if you want a bigger rim for show but stay away from the 19 and 20s if you still want performance.
#12
Originally Posted by Goofyz
the differnce between 17" and 18" are minimal, 19" look a bit silly on the z cuase you have to use 20 series or under tires to keep them from rubbing, and at such a low profile you can not get the performance out of the z you would expect for such a car. 17" probably help you accelerate a bit faster with less rotaional mass but you have something like 28% smaller contact patch to the road so perhaps the 18s make up in traction what the 17 make up for in weight. Maybe not but they probably help you to stop a bit shorter distances. We aren't talking 20 feet or anything but perhaps a good 3-5 feet in 60-0 stoppig distances ( i am talking same make/model of tire but different sizing 17vs18s) on the same car on the same track. But you lose this when you go to ultra low profile cause the tire will not handle road inconsistances or dissipate heat as well. So, to sum up, go with 17s or 18s if you want a bigger rim for show but stay away from the 19 and 20s if you still want performance.
#13
I think it would be really interesting to see some hard numbers on the statement that larger wheels increase the rotating mass of the vehicle by any real significant amounts. While aiming to maintain your stock outside diameters for proper speedo correction, a larger diameter wheel generally increases in size in the spoke length, ie: take the sectional area of the spoke and add a 1/2" in length to go to a 1" taller wheel. Then add that weight for each spoke. With just a quick net search, AL weighs 2,560 kg/cu m.
At the same time, A larger wheel requires less tire and vice-versa. So, when looking at the cross-sectional area of a tire, you reduce the amount of rubber by a rather significant amount when dealing with the length of a circumference. A quick net search show manufactured rubber weighing 1522 kg/cu m. I would speculate that tire rubber is heavier with the plys, belts and the bead cord.
Anyone care to play with these number further?
I do agree that 19's give off that SUV look.
At the same time, A larger wheel requires less tire and vice-versa. So, when looking at the cross-sectional area of a tire, you reduce the amount of rubber by a rather significant amount when dealing with the length of a circumference. A quick net search show manufactured rubber weighing 1522 kg/cu m. I would speculate that tire rubber is heavier with the plys, belts and the bead cord.
Anyone care to play with these number further?
I do agree that 19's give off that SUV look.
#14
Originally Posted by ZLover4Life
3-5 feet of better braking is the difference between a good day and an accident... or a good day and a pair of handcuffs when you plow over a kid who runs out into the street.
The little b@st@rd should stay out of the street.
#15
Originally Posted by CanyonCarver
I think it would be really interesting to see some hard numbers on the statement that larger wheels increase the rotating mass of the vehicle by any real significant amounts. While aiming to maintain your stock outside diameters for proper speedo correction, a larger diameter wheel generally increases in size in the spoke length, ie: take the sectional area of the spoke and add a 1/2" in length to go to a 1" taller wheel. Then add that weight for each spoke. With just a quick net search, AL weighs 2,560 kg/cu m.
At the same time, A larger wheel requires less tire and vice-versa. So, when looking at the cross-sectional area of a tire, you reduce the amount of rubber by a rather significant amount when dealing with the length of a circumference. A quick net search show manufactured rubber weighing 1522 kg/cu m. I would speculate that tire rubber is heavier with the plys, belts and the bead cord.
Anyone care to play with these number further?
At the same time, A larger wheel requires less tire and vice-versa. So, when looking at the cross-sectional area of a tire, you reduce the amount of rubber by a rather significant amount when dealing with the length of a circumference. A quick net search show manufactured rubber weighing 1522 kg/cu m. I would speculate that tire rubber is heavier with the plys, belts and the bead cord.
Anyone care to play with these number further?
The rotating mass of an equivalent section of tire will be less than the outer rim of a wheel when it's moved out a half inch. I mean think about it logically... we're talking about the weight of half an inch of the sidewall of a tire. The bulk of the weight of a tire is in the tread, not the sidewall. If we're not talking about changing the tire's outer diameter, the bulk of the tire's weight will be in the same spot regardless of wheel size - but with 17" wheels, the rim is closer to the center and therefore has less rotational mass.
And in this case, we're talking about moving the rim of a (presumably) heavy wheel to begin with - last time I checked, Axis wheels weren't light. So when you move a heavy rim further out from the center, the rotating mass is going to increase even more. Yeah, an inch on 5Zigen FN01R-Cs or some 350Z S-Tune wheels (the real light Rays ones, I don't remember the model) isn't going to mean as much as an inch on heavy wheels.
And people have looked into it, I just don't have the data on hand. It's pretty much the reason that many people stick with the stock wheels or 17" wheels when they track the car a lot (Greg Dupree and Dean Delvy come to mind... Dean runs stock wheels and Greg runs 17" Volks in the back IIRC, and Greg's doing 9s while Dean does 10s).
Originally Posted by Murph Z32
How much do those wheels weigh Zlover?
http://www.splparts.com/Parts/Univer...en/default.htm
And you're right, kids should stay out of the street... but the majority of people don't think, let alone children.
#16
Originally Posted by Goofyz
the differnce between 17" and 18" are minimal, 19" look a bit silly on the z cuase you have to use 20 series or under tires to keep them from rubbing, and at such a low profile you can not get the performance out of the z you would expect for such a car. 17" probably help you accelerate a bit faster with less rotaional mass but you have something like 28% smaller contact patch to the road so perhaps the 18s make up in traction what the 17 make up for in weight. Maybe not but they probably help you to stop a bit shorter distances. We aren't talking 20 feet or anything but perhaps a good 3-5 feet in 60-0 stoppig distances ( i am talking same make/model of tire but different sizing 17vs18s) on the same car on the same track. But you lose this when you go to ultra low profile cause the tire will not handle road inconsistances or dissipate heat as well. So, to sum up, go with 17s or 18s if you want a bigger rim for show but stay away from the 19 and 20s if you still want performance.
#21
I agree. I don't like the ssr's for the z. The only ones I like my buddy just bought for his NSX. I want to go with those hypersilver Axis Hiros. I just called axis, no spacers are necessary for the front wheels (18 x 8.5). I can put a 19 x 9.5 on the back, with a 2.5" lip. A friend of mine also has a black 90TT with Axis Mod 7's on it. 18 in the front and 19 in the back. I want to see if it has the "SUV" look others have talked about. I have also looked at OZ Gallieon III. Volks are expensive. I like the wheel snowbdr has a pic of, but I like brushed finish with a polised lip. Hell, I've got the car I've always wanted with low mileage. That's the hardest part.
#23
hmm, ill check the site again, i think that color would be killer with black or silver but its all in taste... lemme' take a look for yah.
EDIT: sorta like this?
here is the site im using for volk wheels, not hte site i usually use but it seems to get the job done.
http://www.mackinindustries.com/md/index.html
and yeah volk is expensive but damn good, and hell, if you were ready to drop 1800 on headlights or w/e the cost was i think the price of volk wheels shouldnt faze you to much
and here is volks official site i guess. http://www.rayswheels.co.jp/ some of it is japanese though. lol
EDIT: sorta like this?
here is the site im using for volk wheels, not hte site i usually use but it seems to get the job done.
http://www.mackinindustries.com/md/index.html
and yeah volk is expensive but damn good, and hell, if you were ready to drop 1800 on headlights or w/e the cost was i think the price of volk wheels shouldnt faze you to much
and here is volks official site i guess. http://www.rayswheels.co.jp/ some of it is japanese though. lol
Last edited by snwbrderphat540; 03-22-2007 at 01:56 PM.