280ZX (S130) Forums Dedicated to 79-83 ZCars

overall difference between 2+2 and non 2+2

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-22-2005, 08:30 PM
  #1  
NisTuner
Thread Starter
 
duowing's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Cleveland, Ohio
Posts: 2,800
overall difference between 2+2 and non 2+2

So here I am bored, it's storming outside, and thinking about how I've gotta go rewire my speakers to get them to work with my CD player. Anyway I was wondering one thing. Essentially if you have a 2+2 with the turbo engine and the T5 tranny. If you compared this to the same year 280ZX that was the 2 seater with a Turbo engine and the T5 tranny, would their be a noticeable difference? Does the extra length and the backseat really add that much extra weight that you would see a significant difference between the 280ZX and the 280ZX 2+2? One other thing I was wondering, would it be feasible to take the backseat out of the 2+2 and almost convert the car into a normal 280ZX that's just slightly longer? Or would there be still major differences?
duowing is offline  
Old 09-22-2005, 08:44 PM
  #2  
The Good Twin
 
NismoPick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Wild Wild West, UTAH!
Posts: 20,639
2+2's are heavier & have a longer wheel base. That is the only diff. The back seat to 2seater conversion has already been done... by me.
Attached Thumbnails overall difference between 2+2 and non 2+2-2-2-converted-2-seater.jpg  
NismoPick is offline  
Old 09-22-2005, 08:50 PM
  #3  
NisTuner
Thread Starter
 
duowing's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Cleveland, Ohio
Posts: 2,800
Do you have the conversion fully done? I'd like to see pics of it completed, but even though it's longer and heavier, is it that much heavier that it would be a noticeable performance difference from a regular 2 seater turbo?
duowing is offline  
Old 09-22-2005, 08:51 PM
  #4  
Registered User
 
RubberBerner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: St. Petersburg & Orlando Florida
Posts: 126
Its a massive empty abyss! What's going to go there? a nice roll cage would fill it up nicely.
RubberBerner is offline  
Old 09-22-2005, 10:20 PM
  #5  
Doesn't post much...
 
RodMoyes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Escondido (San Diego) California
Posts: 3,617
The Diference... that's easy.

One is cool, the other is really cool.

Rod.
RodMoyes is offline  
Old 09-23-2005, 01:27 PM
  #6  
Registered User
 
NismoZigma's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: NJ
Posts: 63
I gotta 2+2 and it looks ALOT longer than the 2 seater. I dont know why. Anyways I love the thing cause the seats fold and its very spacious to put stuff in the back.
NismoZigma is offline  
Old 09-23-2005, 01:32 PM
  #7  
The Good Twin
 
NismoPick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Wild Wild West, UTAH!
Posts: 20,639
Originally Posted by NismoZigma
I gotta 2+2 and it looks ALOT longer than the 2 seater. I dont know why.
I'm gunna have to say BECAUSE IT IS LONGER...
NismoPick is offline  
Old 09-23-2005, 01:41 PM
  #8  
NisTuner
Thread Starter
 
duowing's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Cleveland, Ohio
Posts: 2,800
the seat folds?
duowing is offline  
Old 09-23-2005, 02:01 PM
  #9  
The Good Twin
 
NismoPick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Wild Wild West, UTAH!
Posts: 20,639
yeah... the backs fold down to make a larger cargo area. most 2 door 4 seaters do that.
NismoPick is offline  
Old 09-23-2005, 02:01 PM
  #10  
Registered User
 
FubarI33t's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Southaven Mississippi
Posts: 2,053
lol, Yes the rear seats fold. They fold down flat.
FubarI33t is offline  
Old 09-23-2005, 11:34 PM
  #11  
Registered User
 
81 Black L28E's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: squwamton
Posts: 1,046
The Diference
AND KEEP IN MIND THAT I HAVE DRIVEN AND OWNED BOTH

1+1's = TOPEND KILLER

2+2's = KICK OUT KING


The 2 seaters are lighter and seem to pull a little more in the top end

The 2+2 's are heavier and seem to kick out in the corner eazyer

I wouldn't trade my 2 seater for anything.. But i do miss old blue 2+2 once and awhile.


ALSO 1+1's = sexy goddessssss

2+2's = Drifting madman

Last edited by 81 Black L28E; 09-23-2005 at 11:59 PM.
81 Black L28E is offline  
Old 09-23-2005, 11:47 PM
  #12  
Registered User
 
RubberBerner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: St. Petersburg & Orlando Florida
Posts: 126
anybody know the weight ratio's of both? (If anything you can use your door sill sticker to calculate it)
RubberBerner is offline  
Old 09-24-2005, 05:38 PM
  #13  
Registered User
 
jfairladyz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Temecula, CA
Posts: 5,485
Advertised for the 2seater is 50/50. Don't know how accurate that is though, never actually put one on the scales. I'd imagine the 2+2 to be a little more nose heavy. Seems like it would be the opposite but if you think about it when moving the rear wheels further back, you make everthing in front of the rear seats (since thats all the same as the 2seater) more biased toward the front of the car. But then again all that extra weight thats added with the 2+2 may just even things out again.
jfairladyz is offline  
Old 09-24-2005, 10:42 PM
  #14  
lww
Head Muckraker
 
lww's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Bay Area
Posts: 9,221
2+2's have a smaller gas tank as well.
lww is offline  
Old 09-24-2005, 10:50 PM
  #15  
Registered User
 
FubarI33t's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Southaven Mississippi
Posts: 2,053
most 2+2's have a fuel freindly rear Diff also. 3.54 gearing, 2 seater has 3.90 gearing.
FubarI33t is offline  
Old 09-24-2005, 11:12 PM
  #16  
NisTuner
Thread Starter
 
duowing's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Cleveland, Ohio
Posts: 2,800
Anybody know actual weights of the 2 seater vs. 2+2?
duowing is offline  
Old 09-24-2005, 11:22 PM
  #17  
The Good Twin
 
NismoPick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Wild Wild West, UTAH!
Posts: 20,639
here's a link that might clear up some confusion / questions. tho it doesn't have the 2+2 weight, I imagine 2+2's weigh a couple hundred lbs more (unless stripped).

http://www.geocities.com/~z-car/specs/
NismoPick is offline  
Old 09-24-2005, 11:31 PM
  #18  
NisTuner
Thread Starter
 
duowing's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Cleveland, Ohio
Posts: 2,800
So overall the differences in terms of speed and acceleration shouldn't be much different between a 2+2 and a 2+0 with the same Transmission and differential gearing?
duowing is offline  
Old 09-24-2005, 11:33 PM
  #19  
The Good Twin
 
NismoPick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Wild Wild West, UTAH!
Posts: 20,639
not a noticable diff... maybe .05 sec on the 0-60 time.
NismoPick is offline  
Old 09-25-2005, 10:00 AM
  #20  
NisTuner
Thread Starter
 
duowing's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Cleveland, Ohio
Posts: 2,800
See that's what I was wondering, like I was wondering if the extra weight difference was really going to cause that big of a perfomance difference. Cus I would like to one day turbo my Z. I'm thinking well if there's going to be a big difference, then maybe when I plan to turbo I should look for a 2 seater.
duowing is offline  
Old 09-25-2005, 10:14 AM
  #21  
The Good Twin
 
NismoPick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Wild Wild West, UTAH!
Posts: 20,639
Originally Posted by duowing
See that's what I was wondering, like I was wondering if the extra weight difference was really going to cause that big of a perfomance difference. Cus I would like to one day turbo my Z. I'm thinking well if there's going to be a big difference, then maybe when I plan to turbo I should look for a 2 seater.
I really don't think it will make a diff. IMO: I've driven 2seater turbos & I gotta say that I love how my 2+2 feels. I wouldn't trade it for a 2seater now. It just depends on your opinion... IT'S YOUR CAR.
NismoPick is offline  
Old 09-25-2005, 11:09 AM
  #22  
NisTuner
Thread Starter
 
duowing's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Cleveland, Ohio
Posts: 2,800
Thanks Nismo. I really love my 280ZX 2+2. It's just kind of hard to really love it when people seem to be a little harder and more biased against the 2+2's. I guess all in all it really doesn't matter. A Z is a Z, and I should treat the Z like it's meant to be regardless of it being a 2+2 or not.
duowing is offline  
Old 09-25-2005, 02:20 PM
  #23  
Registered User
 
Z*Tech's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Seattle, Wa
Posts: 82
Got a german shepard that hates the coupe and loves the 2+2, with the seat locked down, so he has a place the lay down.

Being that he's got bigger teeth than I do, I tend to drive the 2+2. It's not too bad at all really.
Z*Tech is offline  
Old 09-25-2005, 02:38 PM
  #24  
Doesn't post much...
 
RodMoyes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Escondido (San Diego) California
Posts: 3,617
Originally Posted by NismoPick
not a noticable diff... maybe .05 sec on the 0-60 time.
Did you really mean .05 or did you mean 0.5? I'm thinking it's more like 0.5 at best. Weight is the enemy! I would think that even the extra 1 or 2 hundred pounds (maybe more) that the 2+2 has over the 2 seater would equate to more than 1/20th of a second difference...

Rod.

Last edited by RodMoyes; 09-27-2005 at 12:51 AM.
RodMoyes is offline  
Old 09-27-2005, 12:25 AM
  #25  
Registered User
 
ZedZilla's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 239
Hey Rod.....Wanna RACE! Remember I beat out a PT Cruiser GT before!!!!
ZedZilla is offline  


Quick Reply: overall difference between 2+2 and non 2+2



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 12:05 PM.