280ZX Performance / Technical Discussions related to Turbo charging, Supercharging, Engine, ECU, exhaust, and etc. performance enhancements.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

superchargers

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Mar 24, 2003 | 09:13 PM
  #1  
duckyz's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 903
From: Alameda, CA
superchargers

I have an '83 280ZX GL (n/a). I love the turbo, but I don't want to go through the hassle of "decompresing" my motor or doing an engine swap. Does anyone know of a manufacturer who makes superchargers for an L28? Also...Who has the most reliable product?
Old Mar 25, 2003 | 12:16 PM
  #2  
lifegrddude's Avatar
Externally Wastegated
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 1,220
From: San Diego
Jim Cook Racing makes a supercharger kit, but I wouldn't say it's cheap. If you run a search in google for them, you'll get their site. It actually might be more cost effective to go turbo though since you can't do much about boost on a supercharger except change a pulley and that's it.
John
Old Aug 12, 2004 | 01:50 AM
  #3  
NismoLuv's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 8
From: Boise, ID
check this

you should check out PROCHARGER at http://www.procharger.com/superchargers.shtml
I was thinking of putting it where the A/C compresser is.
Old Aug 12, 2004 | 11:25 PM
  #4  
BgMJon's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 29
i know how a supercharger works and how a turbo works, but how does a procharger work?
Old Aug 13, 2004 | 02:10 PM
  #5  
NismoLuv's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 8
From: Boise, ID
procharger is the name of the company.
Old Aug 13, 2004 | 02:51 PM
  #6  
CWHammer's Avatar
Under My Car... brb
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 386
Don't you still have to "decompress" the cylinders to run a supercharger? You're still adding boost just using a different technology to introduce it.
Old Nov 5, 2004 | 11:55 PM
  #7  
lww's Avatar
lww
Head Muckraker
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 9,221
From: Bay Area
http://www.jimcookracing.com

Originally Posted by lifegrddude
Jim Cook Racing makes a supercharger kit, but I wouldn't say it's cheap. If you run a search in google for them, you'll get their site. It actually might be more cost effective to go turbo though since you can't do much about boost on a supercharger except change a pulley and that's it.
John
Old Mar 26, 2005 | 02:44 PM
  #8  
sk8ur_9's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 57
From: el paso
Where @ the Jim cook racing website can I order a supercharger or parts? Because there it just shows the catalog and 280zx that ther selling, can get a catalog from them?
Old Mar 26, 2005 | 05:42 PM
  #10  
s/cL3.0's Avatar
Bleach is my Hero
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,293
As long as you have a strong bottom you will not have to decompress.. The new 1.8T from VW running 8 psi has a 10:1 compression ratio.. I have ran a turbo with a 8.5:1 with no probs.
Old Mar 26, 2005 | 06:29 PM
  #11  
lww's Avatar
lww
Head Muckraker
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 9,221
From: Bay Area
Originally Posted by sk8ur_9
Where @ the Jim cook racing website can I order a supercharger or parts? Because there it just shows the catalog and 280zx that ther selling, can get a catalog from them?
Page 24 of the online catalogue:

http://www.jimcookracing.com/catalog/page24.html

I would go with a turbo. There are more people who have done it so there's less opportunity for you to encounter a problem that hasn't already been solved by someone before you.

Turbo is ultimately more efficient than a supercharger which has all the same drawbacks related to over-heating the intake charge as well as the same compression restrictions that a turbo setup would have so supercharging doesn't gain any advantage there either.

If you're looking to travel the less trodden path with an option that'll end up with less potential, then the supercharger is fine.




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 01:26 AM.