280ZX Performance / Technical Discussions related to Turbo charging, Supercharging, Engine, ECU, exhaust, and etc. performance enhancements.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Computer Chip

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Jul 7, 2004 | 06:21 PM
  #1  
rupert42's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 36
Computer Chip

were can i find computer chips for my 280zx the one that goes in the dash
Old Jul 8, 2004 | 08:37 AM
  #3  
Bleach's Avatar
The Evil Twin
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 9,296
From: Seattle, WA
Do you want a replacement factory fuel injection ECU or are you looking for a re-programed performance ECU? They never made them for the non-turbo 280zx. (I think) But they are available for the 280zx turbo, zcarparts.com
Old Jul 10, 2004 | 11:09 AM
  #4  
FastZ's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 150
From: Maryville, TN
What can you do for the non-turbo then? Cause I would like to know myself.
Old Jul 10, 2004 | 08:33 PM
  #5  
duckyz's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 903
From: Alameda, CA
Meeee tooooo!!!!!!!
Old Jul 11, 2004 | 12:32 AM
  #6  
Bleach's Avatar
The Evil Twin
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 9,296
From: Seattle, WA
umm... almost nothing. I think they cost the same if they do reprogram them. $600 for +8-10hp? They flow enough fuel, its just that you need bigger intake ports in the head and a longer duration cam. Don't worry so much about the ECU. If you want a programable ECU, build a MegaSquirt unit.
Old Jul 13, 2004 | 08:39 AM
  #7  
FastZ's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 150
From: Maryville, TN
I think I see what you are saying. Get more air into the cylinder and then the computer will balance out the air through the oxygen sensor, right. What about a bigger throttle body and afm? Or what about a mass air sensor(I think that is what it is called, of a 300zx)? Would that be better? Also what duration cam would be good?
Old Jul 13, 2004 | 07:38 PM
  #8  
Skully's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 2,906
From: Saskatoon, SK
i got a bigger afm and all the piping and a bigger TB of a 240sx and then just adjussted the AFM for "proper" mixture, i got a bigger exhaust...i dont notice any power off the line...but the high range is better....but i have a cheap version of "KN"(fake) filter on, really small too.... I had to move on a sunday and everything was closed so i bought that, maybe if i changed that it will improve it more even...
i say go for the larger AFM and larger TB, I have nother large TB but without TPS...i dunno if its of any use
Old Jul 14, 2004 | 07:44 AM
  #9  
Bleach's Avatar
The Evil Twin
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 9,296
From: Seattle, WA
Originally Posted by Skully
...I have nother large TB but without TPS...i dunno if its of any use
Ya, I see those for sale on eBay all the time. Did you get tricked into buying it or did you just pick it up at a wrecking yard?

If you look at dyno sheets that have air/fuel readings almost all 2-valve engines (including the L28) run rich at high rpms where the power drops off. The limiting factor seems to be the cam. The cam is ground in such a way that you have good torque right off idle and good power through 5000 rpm. Your average driver never goes over 3500rpm anyway. (maybe not average for a sports car driver) A longer duration cam with high lift will get more air into the cylinder at those higher rpms and porting out the intake ports and possibly the intake manifold will help a lot too. With the same amount of fuel being meterd you will have a lot more power because you'll have a cleaner burn and higher compression. (less of a vaccume)

I've heard arguments about weather the larger throttle body is nessisary or not. In theory it sounds like a good upgrade as long as you port match the connection on the intake manifold. I put one on and didn't do any other work... and well, its useless. But I got lazy and ran out of money after that.

Also, MegaSquirt fuel injection does not use an air flow meter.

A good cam is 450 lift and 280 duration
Old Jul 16, 2004 | 12:23 PM
  #10  
Skully's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 2,906
From: Saskatoon, SK
i ported...i read an article about if you dont port its actualy worse than the stock TB....
Old Jul 16, 2004 | 12:53 PM
  #11  
Bleach's Avatar
The Evil Twin
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 9,296
From: Seattle, WA
Originally Posted by Skully
i ported...i read an article about if you dont port its actualy worse than the stock TB....
I wouldn't doubt that!
I plan to go back to the stock throttle body. That'll put me back at the smooth throttle response right off idle.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
bnhunt
300ZX (Z32) Forums
11
Jan 1, 2010 10:41 PM
BlueKitsune
300ZX (Z32) Forums
4
Aug 9, 2009 12:20 AM
BlackCrow
350Z (Z33) Forums
2
Jul 5, 2006 04:44 PM
gabrielzzz
280ZX Performance / Technical
19
Jun 7, 2006 10:29 PM
c-murder
300ZX (Z32) Forums
5
Apr 12, 2006 04:58 AM




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:04 PM.