280ZX Performance / Technical Discussions related to Turbo charging, Supercharging, Engine, ECU, exhaust, and etc. performance enhancements.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

300zx Turbo Tranny In 280zx Turbo

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 31, 2005 | 07:43 PM
  #1  
280ZX_AV8R's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 141
From: Near Houston
300zx Turbo Tranny In 280zx Turbo

I have tried HybridZ.org with no luck. So now I shall ask Zdriver.com


I read (HybridZ.org) that you can install a 1984 300zx turbo automatic 4-speed transmission in a 1981-1983 280zx turbo, but I want to do as much research as possible. They say you put the 280zx bellhousing on the 300zx transmission, change the length of the driveshaft, create a rear transmission mount, and you're done.......so, will the 280zx bellhousing bolt up to the 300zx transmission? They also say that the shifter and everything hooks straight up. Doesn't the 280zx have a mechanical speed sensor that connects to the speedometer itself, or is it electronical? also does the 300zx tranny have a mechanical or electronical speed sensor? If the 300zx speed sensor is electronical and the 280zx speed sensor is mechanical, then how do I get the speedometer to work?
Old Sep 1, 2005 | 09:07 AM
  #2  
Bleach's Avatar
The Evil Twin
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 9,296
From: Seattle, WA
I think both use the same mechanical speed sensor with a toothed cog at the end of the cable.
However, I have not heard of this swap before... so I have no idea if the bellhousing swaps on. The manual transmissions I have seen for the L-series do not have just a bellhousing that unbolts. The whole front half of the transmission is one piece. Only the Borg Warner T5 has a separate bellhousing.
If you want a 4-speed auto, find a 1983-84 Maxima with the L24.
Old Sep 1, 2005 | 09:32 AM
  #3  
s/cL3.0's Avatar
Bleach is my Hero
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,293
I know someone in AUSSIE made some kind of adapter to make it fit..
Old Sep 3, 2005 | 06:18 PM
  #4  
280ZX_AV8R's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 141
From: Near Houston
What all do you have to do to put a maxima transmission in?
Old Sep 17, 2005 | 07:34 AM
  #5  
turbot5's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 65
From: Florida
boy, I hope you do it, either maxima or 300 or else, no man will shift faster a turbo engine an cut the turbo lag as well..I have a t5 and besides the "cool aspect" putting a modern 4-5 auto will make one real fast L28T..even in 1983 the fast guys agree on that n it was a 3 gear auto! imagine 4-5!!
Old Sep 23, 2005 | 07:43 PM
  #6  
280ZX_AV8R's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 141
From: Near Houston
after the hurricane passes through houston, i will be looking for a maxima or 300zx turbo auto tranny.
Old Sep 23, 2005 | 08:52 PM
  #7  
jfairladyz's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 5,485
From: Temecula, CA
An auto "Can" shift faster than a human ever could yes. But unless that auto is built for racing it's not going to be a 'fast' tranny. Auto trannys are designed to be softer. The gearing is often not the greatest, the shift points are usually pretty poor for performance, and they allow for slip which is good for dependability but bad for performance. The shifts are actually usually delayed in an auto for smoothness in shifting which results in a longer shift. All in all, an OEM auto trans isn't going to "perform", it's going to treat the car like its a commuter. Tranny's like the C4 and Turbo350 have all kinds of kits and parts made for them that allow them to out perform a manual transmission. But a trans out of a Maxima, or most any street vehicle isn't going to, not by a long shot. If autos your thing though, then it's cool. And it's probably an upgrade on the 3spd. But a manual with a good clutch and good driver will outperform any OEM auto trans of the day.

PS: Yes I relize cars now days have automatic trans that are performance oriented, but the topic was on a Maxima trans. So keep that in mind.
Old Sep 24, 2005 | 06:24 PM
  #8  
turbot5's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 65
From: Florida
quote==== Yes I relize cars now days have automatic trans that are performance oriented,====== but the topic was on a Maxima trans. So keep that in mind.=====glad to see at the end you came to your senses LOL but at the very end you wrong, the topic is a 300turbo tranny on a 280turbo and the slip you mention is what the turbo needs to spool like crazy and cut the turbo lag.
Old Sep 24, 2005 | 07:00 PM
  #9  
jfairladyz's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 5,485
From: Temecula, CA
A 300 auto trans still isn't going to outperform a manual. It's still an econo slush box. And think about this: Which is better, the turbo lag while waiting for spool, or a slipping torque converter that's probably going to continue to slip? If it's going to slip before the turbo even hits full boost then it's going to slip when the turbo hits boost and put's even more strain on the conv. An auto serves it's purpose, but that purpose is not perfromance (atleast not the ones being mentioned here). Even the Z32 auto wasn't up to the task of being a performance trans (though it'll hold a more torque than the 3spd). Now the auto in the 350Z will out perform any of the earlier manuals. But I'm not here to argue and if performance were really the issue then the work it takes to swap from the 3spd to a 4spd auto just wouldn't be reasonable when a T5 could be dropped in and all woe's are forgotten. I think the reality here is that he's looking for a step up from the 3spd. And thats all. I doubt he's looking for all out performance from his trans. And besides, the ONLY place an auto would ever outperform a manual is on the dragstrip. If I had an extra $10k laying around I'd get myself a bullet proof 6spd sequintial box

And besides, would you REALLY want to give up your manual for an auto?
Old Sep 25, 2005 | 07:55 AM
  #10  
turbot5's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 65
From: Florida
Happens in every forum, a member pop up a Q. generally after 2-3 responses the answer begin to sort of shape up, shortly after we all going wild on a castle over sand type of debate where money/time is not part of the equation and the dream car takes shape, with a lot of variations of course at this point I'm not sure which option is better LOL..the fuhrer had a lil Mercedes with a (truck like) low/high rear end at his fingers capable of great speed and was 1938!! I want that n I wanted NOW!
Old Sep 29, 2005 | 04:24 PM
  #11  
280ZX_AV8R's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 141
From: Near Houston
Originally Posted by jfairladyz
I think the reality here is that he's looking for a step up from the 3spd. And thats all. I doubt he's looking for all out performance from his trans.
What I want is to decrease my rpm's at highway speed.......I don't like 4000rpm at 80.........I want 3200 rpm at the most at 80

so jfairladyz is, for the most part right
Old Sep 29, 2005 | 06:20 PM
  #12  
RodMoyes's Avatar
Doesn't post much...
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 3,617
From: Escondido (San Diego) California
Originally Posted by 280ZX_AV8R
What I want is to decrease my rpm's at highway speed.......I don't like 4000rpm at 80.........I want 3200 rpm at the most at 80

so jfairladyz is, for the most part right
If that's all you're going for, wouldn't it be a whole easier/cheaper to change the rear end/final drive ratio?

Rod.
Old Sep 29, 2005 | 06:52 PM
  #13  
280ZX_AV8R's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 141
From: Near Houston
well, I would like to get the best gas mileage while still getting manageable acceleration
Old Sep 29, 2005 | 06:54 PM
  #14  
280ZX_AV8R's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 141
From: Near Houston
and also I would like to get better top speed
Old Sep 30, 2005 | 09:05 AM
  #15  
Bleach's Avatar
The Evil Twin
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 9,296
From: Seattle, WA
If you've already got a 3.54 it'll be hard to find a 3.36 rearend.

I'd say swap to the 4-speed auto, even the 1st gen Maxima one, and then at the same time set your rear gear down slightly. 3.54 to 3.7 would work. Even a 3.9 rear will have much better rpms on the freeway. I know the Maxima tranny has a taller overdrive than even the 280ZX 5-speed. 3.7 is probably best though.
Old Sep 30, 2005 | 02:27 PM
  #16  
NismoZigma's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 63
From: NJ
I gotta 83 with an auto and im wondering what manual trannies will work on it. Its a L28ET so yea its a turbo with an auto. Thanks for the help.
Old Sep 30, 2005 | 02:37 PM
  #17  
NismoPick's Avatar
The Good Twin
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 20,639
From: Wild Wild West, UTAH!
Did ya read the previous posts on this thread? anyway... You need to decide what gear ratio you want, then decide which tranny... you want faster off the line, or faster top end?
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
benny127
280ZX Performance / Technical
1
Sep 13, 2010 12:13 PM
johnsonsz31tt
300ZX (Z31) Forums
93
May 7, 2008 07:27 PM
280ZX_AV8R
280ZX Performance / Technical
1
Aug 28, 2005 07:42 PM
FLiPSyDe71
FS: 240Z,260Z,280Z & 280ZX (70-83)
2
Jan 17, 2005 04:18 PM




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 08:29 PM.