What are the stock HP numbers, for the 2.4L 240?
Guest
Posts: n/a
They are rated at 150 HP, however that is WITHOUT accessories like the water pump etc. So more realistically expect 120 maybe 125-130, the Turbo 2.8L by comparison made 180 HP and 200 TQ, I think those numbers are probably realistic, due to laws mandating certain dyno claims.
In the 60s "everyone" fibbed about dyno one way or another, and measuring back then wasn't accurate to begin with
In the 60s "everyone" fibbed about dyno one way or another, and measuring back then wasn't accurate to begin with
Guest
Posts: n/a
http://www.zccw.org/ZHistory/240Z.html
some good info. the 5 speed transmission isnt right but i think everything else is. you can also look at other years just type the name in place of 240z. (280z, 260z, 280zx, so on.)
some good info. the 5 speed transmission isnt right but i think everything else is. you can also look at other years just type the name in place of 240z. (280z, 260z, 280zx, so on.)
the Dude
Joined: Mar 2002
Posts: 381
From: Bay Area, California
Originally posted by mudge
They are rated at 150 HP, however that is WITHOUT accessories like the water pump etc. So more realistically expect 120 maybe 125-130, the Turbo 2.8L by comparison made 180 HP and 200 TQ, I think those numbers are probably realistic, due to laws mandating certain dyno claims.
They are rated at 150 HP, however that is WITHOUT accessories like the water pump etc. So more realistically expect 120 maybe 125-130, the Turbo 2.8L by comparison made 180 HP and 200 TQ, I think those numbers are probably realistic, due to laws mandating certain dyno claims.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Dorifto
280ZX Brakes, Wheels, Suspension and Chassis
8
Feb 4, 2005 01:06 PM
Bookmarks
