ZDriver.com

ZDriver.com (https://www.zdriver.com/forums/)
-   The Lounge (Off Topic) (https://www.zdriver.com/forums/lounge-off-topic-219/)
-   -   I like how this one ends (https://www.zdriver.com/forums/lounge-off-topic-219/i-like-how-one-ends-23240/)

entropy31 07-06-2007 04:10 PM

I like how this one ends
 
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SaNUiAxtBb8

i have to wonder if that old school MR2 was a supercharged or not though.

SpeciallySpiked 07-06-2007 04:58 PM

hahahaha! yeah!!

Murph Z32 07-07-2007 01:53 AM

That was $$$

entropy31 07-07-2007 02:03 AM

it does make me a bit sad though that nissan chose to take a step backwards with the current Z.

Goofyz 07-07-2007 08:44 AM

well, who is (was) their competition?
 
With the 300zx they had to compete with the RX-7, the Supra, and the Vette. When it came out in 89-90 it blew the doors off everything else, only the redesigned RX-7, Supra and top model Vettes that came out a couple years latter AFTER they knew what to try to beat were in the same league. Now, the Z is still better than most if not all of its competition (price wise) i.e.RX-8, New Mustang... what else is there in the two door coupe division? There is no way it competes with the new vette (its less than 1/2 as much in price and nearly 1/2 in power). So for the money about 26k to start roughly 1/2 the cost of the 1996 z, its a pretty good deal.

Check this out,
http://www.nissanusa.com/nismoz/?nex...moZ_MS.Button4

260zturbo 07-07-2007 08:55 AM

that was great

Murph Z32 07-07-2007 12:10 PM

This one's even better. OH DEAR!!!

http://youtube.com/watch?v=EeNZluEhydE

SportBikeMike 07-07-2007 12:25 PM

Hey the 3Fiddy put up a good battle! The Z32 just barely won with twin turbos and the 350 is N/A.

Murph Z32 07-07-2007 12:27 PM

The tt had a bad launch. Look at the video I posted above you.

SportBikeMike 07-07-2007 12:28 PM

In that second vid...no way that 260 is anywhere near stock....

SportBikeMike 07-07-2007 12:30 PM


Originally Posted by Murph Z32
The tt had a bad launch. Look at the video I posted above you.


I thought it was pretty representative.....all the 0-60 and ET times I've seen for the TT Z32 and 350Z are just a few tenths of a second different. That 350 in the second video must be an automatic or bad driving or something....

Murph Z32 07-07-2007 12:33 PM


Originally Posted by SportBikeMike
In that second vid...no way that 260 is anywhere near stock....

I totally agree. It was hauling balls

zstreet86 07-07-2007 01:20 PM


Originally Posted by entropy31
it does make me a bit sad though that nissan chose to take a step backwards with the current Z.

i dont think they went backwards, the naturally aspirated 350z v6 barely lost to a twin turbo 6cyl. how fast do you think that car would be if it was also twin turbo? its not hard to do because there are tons of FI 350's out there. that being said, you are correct it is still "slower" from the factory which does suck. :(

also let me add i think those two cars come down to a drivers race. lol sorry for getting of subject :)

heu check this one out! car pigeons!

http://youtube.com/watch?v=hF6hxHyfbgk

SportBikeMike 07-07-2007 02:16 PM

Sweeet!! Now that looks like fun!!!

Riz Z Speed 07-07-2007 04:27 PM

4 simple words for that video......

Twin
Turbos
Kick
IN!

:icon_pray:

snwbrderphat540 07-08-2007 07:20 PM

awsome, both my cars trampin everyone. Z32 and 260 FTW!!!! and it could very well be stock. teh carbbed Z's were MUCH faster than the EFI ones actually mostly due to emmmissions. the 260 may not have been stock but i dont think it had much on them. all those cars were still very quiet

entropy31 07-08-2007 08:01 PM

performance is not the only thing i took into consideration when calling the z33 a step backwards. IMO, looks and quality suffered heavily as well. taking all factors into consideration, i would say it is a wash between the s30 and z32. in fact, i would have to say the z33 takes last place in my eyes, unless we consider the z31 2+2.


All times are GMT -7. The time now is 05:24 PM.


© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands