350Z (Z33) Forums Dedicated to 2003 + ZCars otherwize known as the Z33's

350 or s2000

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-01-2004, 03:25 PM
  #2  
confuzed member
 
emo236's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Salinas, CA
Posts: 3,074
That's a hard question to answer. It depends on the drivers. S2000's are very under-rated cars. They are Honda, but they're killer. They're very rev happy and they are light.
emo236 is offline  
Old 04-01-2004, 03:48 PM
  #3  
Registered User
 
JAMESZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Knoxville, Tennessee
Posts: 229
From experience the 350Z is faster. In the S2000 there is no power until the high RPMs it doesn't even seem to start to come alive until 5Grand. In the curves well several of our guys in the Z club here are big road track guys and they spank S2000s all the time. The S2000 is a great car but it has no torque and it's weight doesn't make up for that. The 350Z has a nice torque curve and power curve. The S2000 has a horrible power curve it spikes so low end sucks all the power comes on top end. In the 350Z power is available everywhere.
JAMESZ is offline  
Old 04-01-2004, 07:39 PM
  #4  
VIVA LA Z31!
 
CrAzY_84na's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Elk Grove, Ca
Posts: 401
Yea, Car and driver did a test with the new sports cars...(350Z, S2000,Mustang Mach 1,some others) I Heard that the S2000 was horrible rated...then agian I HEARD...i would take a 350Z over S2000 anyday...
CrAzY_84na is offline  
Old 04-06-2004, 07:51 AM
  #6  
Registered User
 
craZed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: riverveiw,fl
Posts: 102
i have a nearly stock 87, and i took an s2000 on the straight just by raising boost
craZed is offline  
Old 04-06-2004, 09:01 AM
  #7  
VIVA LA Z31!
 
CrAzY_84na's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Elk Grove, Ca
Posts: 401
i know for a fact that the S2000 is less of a car than the Z...Go get a Z and race...

Then agian you did say he is a good driver...that might make the race depending on how well you drive...
CrAzY_84na is offline  
Old 04-06-2004, 11:02 AM
  #8  
Registered User
 
91zxtt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Gerber, CA
Posts: 3,672
Originally Posted by ZZZgirlZZZ
my boyfriend and I read the replies together and he said that of course praise would only be given to the z beause it's a z website. he still is in disbelief of the z's great power. but I will give him one thing though he is a superb driver with amazing skill and technique. -miriam

oh and the z DEFINATELY has more space than the s2000
And if he went to an S2000 site, then they'd say the S2000 was a better car. Tell him to pick up a car magazine (C/D, R&T, MT, etc.) and read. The Z will t, take it hands down. The S2000 is really a gutless wonder. Since it's lighter, the S2000 may feel more nimble, but on the track and on the street, it can't keep up. Also, as someone had mentioned in another thread, "There's no replacement for displacement." 3.5 liter N/A vs. 2.2 liter N/A. No contest.
91zxtt is offline  
Old 04-06-2004, 05:07 PM
  #9  
confuzed member
 
emo236's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Salinas, CA
Posts: 3,074
Originally Posted by 91zxtt
"There's no replacement for displacement." 3.5 liter N/A vs. 2.2 liter N/A. No contest.
Except for three things: weight, forced induction, and nitrous.
emo236 is offline  
Old 04-06-2004, 05:52 PM
  #10  
Registered User
 
91zxtt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Gerber, CA
Posts: 3,672
Originally Posted by emo236
Except for three things: weight, forced induction, and nitrous.

Well, duh, but we're talking base S2000 vs base 350Z, not the S2000 from FATF. That thing was sweet. It's already been pointed out that the S2000 is lighter. That's about the only thing it has going for it. It's not light enough to make up for its inadequate HP & torque ratings. I still say 350.
91zxtt is offline  
Old 04-08-2004, 03:16 PM
  #12  
Registered User
 
JAMESZ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Knoxville, Tennessee
Posts: 229
And you can tell your boyfriend my 1986 Z31 300ZX Turbo took a brand new 2.2 Litre S2000.
JAMESZ is offline  
Old 04-19-2004, 12:24 AM
  #14  
Externally Wastegated
 
lifegrddude's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: San Diego
Posts: 1,220
The S2K isn't a bad car. Granted I don't care for open top cars, but it's like a Miata on steroids. Once you get to VTEC, you won't drop outta the powerband during shifts so they are fairly quick, it's getting them into the cam changeover that sucks. VTEC motors pull very hard from a roll. I'm not a Honda fan, but I'm just saying not to underestimate the little 4 cylinder cause they are pretty quick. Their forte is not drag racing, but more auto cross and circuit stuff, much like the Integra and Civic Type R. I'd say a drag race between a Z and an S2K would be a driver's race though from what I've seen at the strip. There wouldn't be any "spanking" of any sort.
John 82ZXT
lifegrddude is offline  
Old 10-06-2004, 08:43 PM
  #16  
Registered User
 
mwest300zx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Central New Jersey
Posts: 28
I started road racing my 350Z roadster the end of last summer and have done 7 races this summer with one more this coming weekend at Watkins Glen, N.Y. I have come up against a few s2000's. Some older ones with less torque and a few of the newer ones with more low end torque. All I can say is I give a slight edge to the Z, but the edge is so minimal is does not matter. Both are great fun cars to drive. My daughter has a (2000) s2000 and it is a blast to drive. I enjoy them both. This which is faster better is really inconsequential to the average person. It all comes down to ones personal preference. I think which ever one you go with you will not be disappointed. The fun factor in each car with the top down is terrific.
MWest300zxroadster/350zroadster
mwest300zx is offline  
Old 10-09-2004, 01:05 PM
  #17  
Registered User
 
e_racer1999's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: San Diego
Posts: 54
i like both, but i'd rather have the s2k. just something about a 3700 lb 3.5L V6 "z" that doesn't tickle my pickle. i'm not a big displacement fan, so that is my biased opinion. i actually don't care too much for the 350z, and the S2K seems more of a sport roadster than the 350z. JMHO
e_racer1999 is offline  
Old 12-17-2004, 05:07 PM
  #18  
Registered User
 
Longawaited's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 7
I have a s2000 and a Z. In a drag race my s2000 will beat my Z. I will put down any stock z on this form. I live in Michigan. Bring it on!! About the Z, I love the car and Is just as cool as my S.
Longawaited is offline  
Old 12-17-2004, 05:23 PM
  #19  
Registered User
 
Redbeauty84ZX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: NW Arkansas
Posts: 135
Just wondering what your stock S2000 runs in the 1/4???? most the the s2000's at my local track are in the mid to high 14's. I know there capable of better, but no one drives them like they there suppposed to be.
Redbeauty84ZX is offline  
Old 12-17-2004, 07:09 PM
  #20  
Registered User
 
91zxtt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Gerber, CA
Posts: 3,672
Originally Posted by Longawaited
I have a s2000 and a Z. In a drag race my s2000 will beat my Z. I will put down any stock z on this form. I live in Michigan. Bring it on!! About the Z, I love the car and Is just as cool as my S.

Sorry, but you're wrong.
0-60 1/4 mile
S2000 5.8 sec 14.4 sec @ 98mph
350z 5.4 sec 14.0 sec @ 102mph

http://www.automotiveforums.com/vbulletin/t305977.html

You're driving style may be more suited to performance characteristics of the s2k.
91zxtt is offline  
Old 12-17-2004, 10:16 PM
  #21  
Registered User
 
newbie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 5
just get fd3s rx7. You will be happy. I've raced, supra TT, 300zxTT, 350z, s2000, 3000gt vr4, porsche s4, m3, m3, evo, sti, lighting. They have all read my back license plate. You just can't go worng with rx7, but you have to have $$ for maint.

Last edited by newbie; 12-17-2004 at 10:19 PM.
newbie is offline  
Old 12-18-2004, 10:10 AM
  #22  
Registered User
 
Longawaited's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 7
I can run a 0-60 in 5.1 and 1/4 mile in 13.9. I have taken four driving classes because I'm buying a viper is spring. If you want to drive a viper safely and fast you need classes.

Originally Posted by 91zxtt
Sorry, but you're wrong.
0-60 1/4 mile
S2000 5.8 sec 14.4 sec @ 98mph
350z 5.4 sec 14.0 sec @ 102mph

http://www.automotiveforums.com/vbulletin/t305977.html

You're driving style may be more suited to performance characteristics of the s2k.
Longawaited is offline  
Old 12-18-2004, 10:21 AM
  #23  
Registered User
 
Longawaited's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 7
Check the list



CLASSIC CAR & VINTAGE AUTOMOBILE REGISTRY
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Auto Facts Home
Feedback Form
Add to Favorites
Classic Car
Division
HOME
Registration
Why Register?
Events Calendar
VIN Information
The Fastlane
Monthly Feature
Feature archives
Clubs & Assoc.
Links



North America's Fastest Production Cars

The following is a list we've compiled of the fastest accelerating production cars (F.A.P.C.) and trucks built by any major manufacturer for the North American market.

Year
Make
Model
Engine
HP
1/4 mile
(seconds) 1/4 mile
speed
(MPH)
Source
1968 Plymouth S/S Barracuda 426 Hemi V8 425 ** 10.5 130 MCR
1968 Dodge S/S Hemi Dart 426 Hemi V8 425 ** 10.5 129 MCR
2003 Ferrari Enzo 6.0L V12 660 10.8 135 MT
1969 Chevrolet Corvette ZL1 427 V8 430 ** 10.9 132 PM
2004 Porsche Carrera GT 5.7L V10 612 11.0 130 MT
2003 Saleen S7 427 V8 550 11.36 127 MT
2005 Ford GT 5.4L V8 S/C 500 11.6 128 CD
1997 Ameritech McLaren F1 6.0L V12 627 11.6 125 MT
2002 Lamborghini Murcielago 6.2L V12 571 11.72 122.52 MT
1964 Ford Fairlane T-bolt 427 V8 425 ** 11.76 122.78 CC
2003 Dodge Viper SRT-10 8.3L V10 500 11.77 123.63 MT
2001 Lamborghini Diablo VT 6.0L V12 550 11.8 121.0 MT
1997 Shelby Cobra 427 S/C 427 V8 488 11.8 121.0 MT
2004 Porsche Turbo X50 3.6L H6 T/C 450 11.86 119.91 MT
2002 Porsche 911 GT2 3.6L H6 T/C 456 11.9 120.6 CD
2004 Mercedes-Benz SL600 5.5L V12 T/C 493 11.9 120 CD
2001 Porsche 911 Turbo 3.6L H6 T/C 415 11.9 115.6 MT
2004 Superformance Brock Coupe 402 V8 515 12.0 120 MT
2000 Lamborghini Diablo 6.0L V12 550 12.0 119.8 CD
1963 Dodge Ramcharger 426 V8 425 12.0 117 MCR
2004 Porsche GT3 3.6L H6 380 12.07 116.04 MT
1997 Dodge Viper GTS 8.0L V10 450 12.07 115.2 MCR
1997 Ferrari F50 4.7L V12 513 12.1 124.5 CD
2000 Shelby Series 1 4.0L V8 S/C 450 12.1 120 CD
2000 Dodge Viper ACR 8.0L V10 460 12.2 119.2 MT
1966 AC / Shelby Cobra 427 V8 425 12.2 118 CC
2000 Ferrari 360 Modena 3.6L V8 395 12.2 113.5 MT
2003 Ferrari 575M Maranello 5.7L V12 508 12.26 118.58 MT
2002 Chevrolet Corvette Z06 LS6 350 V8 405 12.29 116 CD
1997 Dodge Viper RT/10 8.0L V10 450 12.3 117.19 MT
2003 Mercedes-Benz CL55 AMG 5.4L V8 S/C 493 12.38 114.45 MT
2003 Mercedes-Benz E55 AMG 5.4L V8 S/C 469 12.39 116.21 MT
2003 Mercedes-Benz SL55 AMG 5.4L V8 S/C 469 12.5 116.1 MT
2004 Ferrari Challenge Stradale 3.6L V8 425 12.53 114.14 MT
2001 Chevrolet Corvette Z06 LS6 350 V8 385 12.57 113.96 MT
2003 Audi RS 6 4.2L V8 T/C 450 12.63 108.64 MT
2001 Shelby Cobra 289 FIA 5.0L V8 350 12.7 108.1 MT
1969 Chevrolet Camaro ZL1 427 V8 430 12.76 107 MCR
1990
Chevrolet Corvette ZR1 LT5 350 V8 375 12.8 113.8 MT
2003 Ford Mustang Cobra 4.6L V8 S/C 390 12.8 113.2 CD
2000 Ford Mustang Cobra R 5.4L V8 385 12.8 112.7 MT
1966 Chevrolet Corvette L72 427 V8 425 12.8 112 CD
2002 BMW Z8 5.0L V8 394 12.8 111.6 MT
2002 Ferrari 360 Spider 3.6L V8 395 12.8 110.8 MT
1993 Dodge Viper RT/10 8.0L V10 400 12.8 110 MT
1999 Lotus Esprit 3.5L V8 T/C 350 12.85 110.96 MT
2002 Aston Martin Vanquish 6.0L V12 460 12.9 112.9 CD
1969 Plymouth Road Runner 440 V8 6-pack 390 12.91 111.8 SS
1999 Chevrolet Corvette LS1 350 V8 350 12.98 108.85 MT
1997 Pontiac Firebird / Hurst LS1 350 V8 350 12.99 103.11 MCR
2003 Maserati Coupe Cambio 4.2L V8 385 13.0 110.4 MT
2003 Chevrolet Corvette convertible LS1 350 V8 350 13.0 109.6 MT
1969 Chevrolet Camaro SS L78 396 V8 375 13.0 108.6 SA
1970 Plymouth Cuda 440 V8 6-pack 390 13.0 105.74 MCR
2002 Mercedes-Benz SLK32 AMG 3.2L V6 S/C 349 13.0 105.2 CD
2004 Lamborghini Gallardo 5.0L V10 495 13.08 109.89 MT
1995
Chevrolet Corvette ZR1 LT5 350 V8 405 13.1 112 MT
2002 BMW M5 5.0L V8 400 13.1 109.4 MT
2004 Porsche 911 Anniversary Ed. 3.6L H6 345 13.1 108.2 MT
2001 BMW M Roadster 3.2L 6-cyl 315 13.1 107.6 MT
1970 Plymouth Cuda 426 Hemi V8 425 13.1 107.12 CC
1970 Dodge Challenger SE 426 Hemi V8 425 13.1 107.12 CC
1970 Chevrolet Chevelle SS LS6 454 V8 450 13.12 107.01 CC
1999 Ferrari F355 3.5L V8 375 13.13 107.56 MT
2003 Ford Mustang Mach 1 4.6L V8 305 13.13 105.51 MM
2004 Mercedes-Benz CLK55 AMG 5.4L V8 362 13.14 108.07 MT
1999 Pontiac Firebird Formula LS1 350 V8 320 13.15 108.27 MT
1991 GMC Syclone 4.3L V6 T/C 280 13.16 100 PHR
2002 Acura NSX 3.2L V6 290 13.17 107.65 CD
2004 Dodge Ram SRT-10 8.3L V10 500 13.19 107.07 MT
1999 Chevrolet Camaro SS LS1 350 V8 320 13.2 108.8 MT
2004 Maserati Spyder Vintage 4.2L V8 385 13.2 108.2 MT
1991 Pontiac Firehawk 350 V8 350 13.2 107 CD
2002 BMW M3 Coupe 3.2L 6-cyl 333 13.2 106.9 MT
1969 Pontiac GTO Judge 400 V8 370 13.2 104 MCR
2004 Mitsubishi Lancer Evolution RS 2.0L I4 T/C 271 13.2 99.8 MT
2004 Subaru WRX STi 2.5L F4 T/C 300 13.23 104.6 MT
2003 Mercedes-Benz CLK55 5.5L V8 362 13.24 107.41 MT
2003 Mercedes-Benz C32 AMG 3.2L V6 S/C 349 13.24 106.86 CD
1987 Buick GNX 3.8L V6 T/C 300 13.26 104 CI
2002 Ferrari Barchetta Pininfarina 5.5L V12 485 13.3 111.8 CD
1968 Chevrolet Corvette L71 427 V8 435 13.3 108 HPC
1969 Plymouth Road Runner 426 Hemi V8 425 13.32 107.7 SS
1968 Oldsmobile 4-4-2 W-30 400 V8 360 13.33 103.56 CC
1967 Pontiac GTO 400 V8 360 13.37 103.4 MCR
1970 Buick GS Stage 1 455 V8 360 13.38 105.5 MT
1998 Pontiac Firebird Trans Am LS1 350 V8 305 13.4 107.3 MT
2000 Aston Martin DB7 Vantage 5.9L V12 420 13.4 106.4 MT
2004 Maybach 57 5.5L V12 T/C 543 13.4 106.4 RT
1991 Pontiac Firehawk 350 V8 350 13.4 105.2 MT
2002 Aston Martin DB7 Vantage Volante 5.9L V12 414 13.4 105.1 MT
1968 Chevrolet Corvette L72 427 V8 425 13.41 109.5 CD
2003 Jaguar XKR 4.2L V8 S/C 390 13.43 105.36 MT
2004 Audi S4 4.2L V8 340 13.44 105.06 CD
1999 Mitsubishi 3000 GT 3.0L V6 T/C 320 13.44 101.79 CD
1996 Chevrolet Camaro SS LT1 350 V8 310 13.46 106.48 MCR
1969 Dodge Super Bee 440 V8 6-pack 390 13.46 103.02 MCR
1969 Dodge Charger 500 426 Hemi V8 425 13.48 109 HR
2004 Cadillac CTS-V LS1 346 V8 400 13.48 105.33 MT
2000 Pontiac Trans Am WS6 LS1 350 V8 325 13.5 107.4 MT
2000 Chevrolet Camaro SS LS1 350 V8 325 13.5 107.3 MT
1968 Dodge Charger 426 Hemi V8 425 13.5 105 CD
1967 Plymouth GTX 426 Hemi V8 425 13.5 105 CD
1993 Pontiac Firehawk LT1 350 V8 300 13.5 103.5 MT
1989 Pontiac Trans Am 20th Ann. 3.8L V6 T/C 290 13.5 103 CC
1970 Pontiac GTO 455 V8 360 13.53 103.51 MCR
1968 Plymouth Road Runner 426 Hemi V8 425 13.54 105.1 CD
1973 Pontiac Trans Am 455 V8 290 13.54 104.29 HR
1968 Dodge Charger R/T 426 Hemi V8 425 13.54 101 MCR
1969 Chevrolet Corvette L88 427 V8 430 13.56 111.1 HR
1968 Ford Mustang 428 V8 CJ 335 13.56 106.6 HR
1969 Ford Mustang Boss 429 429 V8 375 13.6 106 HPC
1967 Shelby Mustang GT500 428 V8 CJ 355 13.6 106 CC
1993 Toyota Supra Turbo 3.0L I6 T/C 320 13.6 106 CD
2003 Panoz Esperante 4.6L V8 320 13.6 105.34 MT
1968 Chevrolet Chevelle SS L78 396 V8 375 13.6 105 PHR
2002 BMW M3 convertible 3.2L 6-cyl 333 13.6 103.8 MT
2004 Pontiac GTO LS1 350 V8 350 13.62 104.78 MT
1970 Dodge Challenger R/T 440 V8 6-pack 390 13.62 104.3 CC
2002 Jaguar XJR 4.0L V8 S/C 370 13.62 104.21 CD
2001 Ford SVT F150 Lightning 5.4L V8 S/C 380 13.62 101.16 PM
1970 Ford Torino Cobra 429 V8 SCJ 370 13.63 105.9 SS
1968 Chevrolet Biscayne 427 V8 425 13.65 105 SS
1995 Ford Mustang Cobra R 351 V8 300 13.67 102.82 MCR
1970 Buick GSX 455 V8 360 13.66 100.2 CC
2004 Jaguar S-type R 4.2L V8 S/C 390 13.69 101.31 MT
1964 Dodge Polara 500 426 V8 365 13.7 107.37 HPC
1996 Chevrolet Corvette GS LT4 350 V8 330 13.7 105.1 RT
1971 Ferrari Daytona 4.4L V12 352 13.7 104 AM
1969 Plymouth GTX 440 V8 375 13.7 102.8 MT
1991 Dodge Stealth 3.0L V6 T/C 300 13.7 101 MT
1969 Dodge Dart 440 V8 375 13.71 105 CC
1971 Plymouth Road Runner 440 6-pack 385 13.71 101.2 CC
1971 Plymouth Cuda 440 6-pack 385 13.72 106 SS
1971 Chevrolet Corvette LS6 454 V8 450 13.72 102.04 CC
1971 Dodge Super Bee 426 Hemi V8 425 13.73 104 MT
1969 Ford Mustang Mach 1 428 V8 CJ 335 13.73 102.31 CC
1968 Chevrolet Camaro Z28 302 V8 290 13.75 107 HPF
1962 Dodge Ramcharger 413 V8 410 13.75 106.76 CL
1969 Mercury Cougar Eliminator 428 V8 CJ 335 13.76 102.09 MCR
2003 Porsche Boxster S 3.2L H6 258 13.76 102.08 MT
1968 Oldsmobile Cutlass (Hurst/Olds) 455 V8 W-30 390 13.77 103.91 SS
2004 Nissan 350Z Track 3.5L V6 287 13.77 100.94 MT
1968 Pontiac Firebird 400 V8 335 13.79 106 HR
2004 Porsche Cayenne Turbo 4.5L V8 T/C 450 13.79 102.47 MT
2001 Chevrolet Camaro Z28 LS1 350 V8 310 13.8 108.5 CD
1967 Chevrolet Corvette 427 V8 435 13.8 108 HR
1969 Pontiac Catalina 421 V8 405 13.8 106 CD
2001 Jaguar Vanden Plas 4.0L V8 S/C 370 13.8 104.2 MT
1965 Dodge Coronet 426 Hemi V8 425 13.8 104 CD
1971 Ford Mustang Boss 351 351 V8 330 13.8 104 MT
2001 Ford Mustang Cobra 4.6L V8 320 13.8 103.3 MT
2000 Honda S2000 2.0L I4 240 13.8 100.5 MT
2004 Subaru Forester 2.5 XT 2.5L H4 T/C 210 13.8 97 CD
1967 Plymouth Satellite 426 Hemi V8 425 13.81 104 CD
1969 Dodge Coronet R/T 440 V8 375 13.83 102.27 SS
1987 Buick Grand National 3.8L V6 T/C 245 13.85 99 CD
1968 Mercury Cyclone GT 428 V8 CJ 335 13.86 101.69 MT
1969 Chevrolet Nova SS L78 396 V8 375 13.87 105.14 HR
1969 Shelby Mustang GT500 428 V8 CJ 335 13.87 104.52 SS
1969 Mercury Cyclone CJ 428 V8 CJ 335 13.88 101.7 MT
1970 Oldsmobile 4-4-2 W-30 455 V8 370 13.88 95.84 CC
1962 Chevrolet Corvette 327 V8 FI 360 13.89 105.14 HR
1969 Plymouth Barracuda 440 V8 375 13.89 103.21 SS
2003 Dodge SRT-4 2.4L I4, T/C 215 13.89 101.88 MT
1962 Pontiac Catalina 421 V8 405 13.9 107 MT
2002 Porsche 911 Cabriolet 3.6L H6 320 13.9 104.8 MT
1972 Pontiac Firebird Trans Am 455 V8 300 13.9 104.6 CD
1969 Ford Mustang Mach 1 428 V8 CJ 335 13.9 103.32 CL
1969 Pontiac GTO 400 V8 360 13.9 102.8 CL
1998 Chevrolet Camaro Z28 LS1 350 V8 305 13.9 102.5 RT
2003 Nissan 350Z Touring 3.5L V6 287 13.9 102.3 MT
Longawaited is offline  
Old 12-19-2004, 07:38 AM
  #24  
Registered User
 
wilson101's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 11
Buy the top of the line Z

Buy the top of the line Z and with the money left from not buying a honda drop into upgrades and will see whos better.
wilson101 is offline  
Old 12-19-2004, 11:07 AM
  #25  
Registered User
 
Longawaited's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 7
A Z will never touch a viper !!.


Originally Posted by wilson101
Buy the top of the line Z and with the money left from not buying a honda drop into upgrades and will see whos better.
Longawaited is offline  


Quick Reply: 350 or s2000



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 08:50 PM.