300ZX (Z32) Performance / Technical Discussions related to Turbo charging, Supercharging, Engine, ECU, exhaust, and etc. performance enhancements and Techical related.

need the 411 on Zs

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-27-2006, 01:22 AM
  #1  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
bLackout's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 26
need the 411 on Zs

need to kno if my z is gonna be a good investment...91 TT. if i WERE to replace the turbos wit new ones, and put a moderate amount of boost, not overwhelming. would there need to be a lotta minor modifications to the fuel pump, valves, pistons, cams. in other words, does the z32 have a good fuel system that will withstand the extra output of new turbos? will the engine be able to handle a decent amount of boost without blowing a piston or needing extra modification? basically im trying to compare the Z to the mr2. because the mr2 engines and fuel system r said to handle a decent amount of boost in its stock form, is this true for the Zs?
bLackout is offline  
Old 01-27-2006, 07:07 AM
  #2  
Encyclopedic Knowledge
 
ZLover4Life's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Naperville, IL
Posts: 3,316
there have been people who have done in the area of 750RWHP on a stock long block and stock fuel pump (and the stock Z32TT fuel pump is a common modification for high-horsepower supras).
ZLover4Life is offline  
Old 01-27-2006, 08:43 AM
  #3  
confuzed member
 
emo236's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Salinas, CA
Posts: 3,074
if you're getting upgraded turbos (not new stock), then you'll probably want to go with bigger injectors. And don't forget to upgrade your ECU.
emo236 is offline  
Old 01-27-2006, 01:24 PM
  #4  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
bLackout's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 26
z32 enthusiast

thats good to hear. thanks for the info... o yea. decided to wit the smics. now tryin to decide on a good brand
bLackout is offline  
Old 01-27-2006, 01:44 PM
  #5  
The Cake Is A Lie!
 
entropy31's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: WA
Posts: 5,690
i think the stillens are the most efficient.
entropy31 is offline  
Old 01-27-2006, 03:30 PM
  #6  
confuzed member
 
emo236's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Salinas, CA
Posts: 3,074
Originally Posted by entropy31
i think the stillens are the most efficient.
2nd....stillen.
emo236 is offline  
Old 01-27-2006, 04:05 PM
  #7  
Encyclopedic Knowledge
 
ZLover4Life's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Naperville, IL
Posts: 3,316
well... ARC are the best, but they're also $2113. Stillens are the next best though.
ZLover4Life is offline  




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 08:57 PM.