300ZX (Z32) Performance / Technical Discussions related to Turbo charging, Supercharging, Engine, ECU, exhaust, and etc. performance enhancements and Techical related.

my z is getting way to much fuel

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-16-2007, 04:54 AM
  #26  
Encyclopedic Knowledge
 
ZLover4Life's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Naperville, IL
Posts: 3,316
Originally Posted by bardabe
the rubber lines will burst beyond 62Psi. so I will asume the reading is off. noway in hell the Injectors can take that much pressure let alone the O-Rings. get a Nismo FPR and call it a day.

Not true. How do I know this? Because if it were true, the entire fuel system on the 300ZX could not handle any significant boost level, and I (s well as you) know that to be untrue.

This is because fuel pressure increases directly with boost pressure. As it is 6:47am, I don't remember what the vacuum is at idle, but I know it's in the vicinity of -15psi. When the car is at 0 vacuum, that means fuel pressure increases by 15psi as well. That means when you're just accelerating with no boost at all (or, in the case of an NA, accelerating almost at all), you have about 44.1psi + 15psi = 59.1psi of fuel pressure.

If you're statement that out fuel lines couldn't handle more than 62psi were correct, that'd mean that a Twin Turbo 300ZX could not boost more than 2.9psi without bursting a fuel line. (Using onlineconversions.com and knowing my car sits at close to -500mmHg, it's telling me that's about -10psi, which seems to low to me... but even so... that would mean an accelerating Z32 sees 54.1psi of fuel pressure. By your statement, a Twin Turbo could not boost more than 12psi without bursting the fuel lines.)

Guess what... I've done 26psi and never bursted a fuel line.

Those lines handle much more than 62psi. They handle at least 85psi, in my experience. 125psi is not impossible, realistically.
ZLover4Life is offline  
Old 06-16-2007, 05:40 AM
  #27  
Jack Of All Trades
 
CanyonCarver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Acton, California
Posts: 2,296
Originally Posted by bardabe
the rubber lines will burst beyond 62Psi.
Most standard high pressure fuel injection hose is rated to 125 psi
CanyonCarver is offline  
Old 06-16-2007, 10:25 AM
  #28  
Über User
 
snwbrderphat540's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: lemont, Illinois
Posts: 9,532
Originally Posted by ZLover4Life
but I know it's in the vicinity of -15psi.
sorry, but you sure about that, are you sure its not 15 inHG. thats what vacumme is usually measured in
snwbrderphat540 is offline  
Old 06-16-2007, 10:49 AM
  #29  
Encyclopedic Knowledge
 
ZLover4Life's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Naperville, IL
Posts: 3,316
Originally Posted by snwbrderphat540
sorry, but you sure about that, are you sure its not 15 inHG. thats what vacumme is usually measured in
In parenthesis, I stated that I know my car sits close to -500mmHg at idle (this is from my boost controller's readings), and went on to discuss that, at that conversion, his statement suggests that the car couldn't boost more than 12psi. No matter if I was wrong about 15psi of vacuum or 15inHg, I know I'm right that my car idles at -500mmHg, and that his statement about bursting fuel lines is wrong.
ZLover4Life is offline  
Old 06-16-2007, 01:33 PM
  #30  
Über User
 
snwbrderphat540's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: lemont, Illinois
Posts: 9,532
oh yeah i can see that and the point was made clear and almost hard to follow lol, just pointing out the psi/inHg difference as to that could confuse someone trying to follow what you explained, but the 500mmHg kinda clears that up i guess huh.... fine..... nevermind.....

soooo where is this guy that started the thread just like to hear some feed back from him now.
snwbrderphat540 is offline  
Old 06-16-2007, 02:45 PM
  #31  
Encyclopedic Knowledge
 
ZLover4Life's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Naperville, IL
Posts: 3,316
Originally Posted by snwbrderphat540
oh yeah i can see that and the point was made clear and almost hard to follow lol, just pointing out the psi/inHg difference as to that could confuse someone trying to follow what you explained, but the 500mmHg kinda clears that up i guess huh.... fine..... nevermind.....
Well it was 6 in the morning when I wrote that post... lol

btw, I know vacuum usually isn't measured in psi (it's strange to speak in terms of negative pounds of anything), but for the purpose of the fuel system and it's direct relationship to the vacuum/boost pressure, it was necessary for me to do so. To say that fuel pressure increases by 1psi for every 51.715 milimeters of mercury or for every 2.036 inches of mercury only confuses people. But saying that fuel pressure increases by 1psi for every 1psi decrease in vacuum/increase in boost is very easy.

Originally Posted by snwbrderphat540
soooo where is this guy that started the thread just like to hear some feed back from him now.
Probably embarassed to post because he didn't test the fuel pressure like we told him to and came back with a bogus lie because he was too lazy to do it right. But I could be wrong.

Last edited by ZLover4Life; 06-16-2007 at 02:51 PM.
ZLover4Life is offline  
Old 06-16-2007, 04:40 PM
  #32  
Registered User
 
Goofyz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Ohio
Posts: 459
I am a little confused

at sea level air pressure is normally about 14.7 psi. So at idle you should get about (negative) -14.7 psi. What we would normally call the full vacuum pressure of a car (natural or boosted) this 14.7psi is also felt on the liquid in the fuel tank but liquid builds pressure under its own weight too. So under normal conditions (non pressurized tank) the fuel line pressure would be a function of the height of the fuel in the tank + the atmospheric pressure hence the time for the tank to drain out is generally the volume, V, divided by the flow rate, Q. However, the flow rate Q is a function of the deltaP across the opening which is in turn dependent upon the height, H, of fuel in the tank. This is solved with integral calculus (I use S for the integration 'squiggle'):


t = S (A / Q) dH

using this you can get how long it takes to empty a tank if you know its dimensions. Your fuel pump adds pressure to keep the drainage at a rate consistent with the value needed to keep the air/fuel mixture correct. Since that value is always in flux due to throttle position car manufactures overdue the pressure at the tank and regulate it down the line. Its much easier to regulate fuel pressure through a line than over a changing volume of fuel in a tank. So, you get a fuel pressure regulator which is controlled by the vacuum pressure of the engine. That gives you the major acceleration control pre-boost levels. Post boost levels are when the fuel pressure regulator is run at its highest opening and then the major fuel regulation is controlled by pulse length regulation of the ECU/O2/MAF sensors loop at the fuel injector.

at least, that is what my dad told me...
Goofyz is offline  
Old 06-16-2007, 05:49 PM
  #33  
Über User
 
snwbrderphat540's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: lemont, Illinois
Posts: 9,532
yeah....... see im out of AP physics..... soooooooo stop. lol, im not reading anything else that has a formula in it.
snwbrderphat540 is offline  
Old 06-16-2007, 05:50 PM
  #34  
Encyclopedic Knowledge
 
ZLover4Life's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Naperville, IL
Posts: 3,316
That whole first paragraph is correct but irrelevant because of the second sentence of the second paragraph. We have fuel pumps that change how the tank empties. Everything in the second paragraph is correct as well, but it's nothing new to the conversation. But there is one statement that bugs me a bit...

Originally Posted by Goofyz
Post boost levels are when the fuel pressure regulator is run at its highest opening and then the major fuel regulation is controlled by pulse length regulation
This ignores the fact that Fuel Pump Control Unit adjusts the speed of the fuel pump, which also regulates fuel pressure. Yes, injector pulse length is altered, but that's in conjunction with the fuel pump speeding up to provide higher fuel pressures and, thus, more fuel for higher RPM/higher boost.

This is all a useless tangent though (sorry to say). This thread can be summed up simply as:

Z is getting too much fuel.
Owner claims 125psi of fuel pressure, but might be full of sh*t.
Stock fuel hose can handle 125psi of fuel pressure.

Last edited by ZLover4Life; 06-16-2007 at 05:52 PM.
ZLover4Life is offline  
Old 06-16-2007, 07:56 PM
  #35  
Jack Of All Trades
 
CanyonCarver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Acton, California
Posts: 2,296
Manifold vacuum in an internal combustion engine, at idle, at seal level should be ~18-22 in-hg. This is od school tech. You can tell alot about the condition of your motor by monitoring the varying vacuum pressures thru your rpm range.

Here is an interesting read for those that are interested. --->>> Vacuum Measurement <<<---

How is it that this thread got onto this subject?
CanyonCarver is offline  
Old 06-16-2007, 08:12 PM
  #36  
Encyclopedic Knowledge
 
ZLover4Life's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Naperville, IL
Posts: 3,316
Originally Posted by CanyonCarver
How is it that this thread got onto this subject?
When it was said that the fuel lines couldn't handle more than 62psi, I explained that it was a ridiculous statement because fuel pressure varies directly with manifold pressure, and therefore the lines must withstand significantly more than 62psi.
ZLover4Life is offline  
Old 06-16-2007, 10:22 PM
  #37  
Jack Of All Trades
 
CanyonCarver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Acton, California
Posts: 2,296
Originally Posted by ZLover4Life
When it was said that the fuel lines couldn't handle more than 62psi, I explained that it was a ridiculous statement because fuel pressure varies directly with manifold pressure, and therefore the lines must withstand significantly more than 62psi.
oh yeah.

iirc, some of the tt.net guys are seeing fuel pressure of 80+ psi when boosting.
CanyonCarver is offline  
Old 06-16-2007, 11:53 PM
  #38  
Encyclopedic Knowledge
 
ZLover4Life's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Naperville, IL
Posts: 3,316
Originally Posted by CanyonCarver
oh yeah.

iirc, some of the tt.net guys are seeing fuel pressure of 80+ psi when boosting.
I have no doubts of this, but I'm sure they're also running smaller injectors and increasing the fuel pressure with an adjustable FPR to compensate for less injector flow. 80+psi of fuel pressure with a stock FPR would presuppose about 30psi of boost, and not many people run that much. lol
ZLover4Life is offline  
Old 06-17-2007, 01:35 AM
  #39  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
tc300zx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: traverse city, Mi
Posts: 19
i gess the aftermarket fpr with guage in it might be broken im getting anoter fuel pressure guage, its got new high pressure lines on it and it was leaking a little bit ill re test it...
tc300zx is offline  
Old 06-17-2007, 03:11 AM
  #40  
Encyclopedic Knowledge
 
ZLover4Life's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Naperville, IL
Posts: 3,316
In my completely honest opinion, you shouldn't be putting any FPR (or fuel system component) in your car unless it came in a box marked "Nissan" or "Nismo." But yeah, get an inline fuel pressure gauge (they have them at AutoZone) and T into the fuel line... let us know the readings.
ZLover4Life is offline  
Old 06-18-2007, 09:12 PM
  #41  
Registered User
 
91zxtt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Gerber, CA
Posts: 3,672
For what it's worth.....my boost/vacuum gauage reads 18-20 psi at idle.
91zxtt is offline  
Old 06-19-2007, 02:32 AM
  #42  
Über User
 
snwbrderphat540's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: lemont, Illinois
Posts: 9,532
inHg. COUGH* couhg* ehem.... wow sorry boot that little tickle in my throat
snwbrderphat540 is offline  
Old 06-19-2007, 01:17 PM
  #43  
Encyclopedic Knowledge
 
ZLover4Life's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Naperville, IL
Posts: 3,316
Originally Posted by snwbrderphat540
inHg. COUGH* couhg* ehem.... wow sorry boot that little tickle in my throat
No, that's in PSI (didn't we already go through this?). And that's actually a healthy vacuum reading in PSI.

18psi of vacuum is 36.64inHg, 20psi is 40.72inHg. So his -20 to -18 psi vacuum reading is -40.72 to -36.64 inchces of mercury.

And Eric, for future reference, you'll never see an inch reading anywhere on our Z cars. They're metric... so the readings would be in mmHg if they were not in PSI.
ZLover4Life is offline  
Old 06-19-2007, 01:21 PM
  #44  
Über User
 
snwbrderphat540's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: lemont, Illinois
Posts: 9,532
my bad, i was thinking aftermarket boost guage, i forgot the Z32's boost guage actually has NUMBERS on it stock and not just little pictures like most stock boost guages, i officially apologize then. guess its been a while since ive even seen teh inside of a z32 let alone a TT one....
snwbrderphat540 is offline  
Old 06-19-2007, 04:11 PM
  #45  
Encyclopedic Knowledge
 
ZLover4Life's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Naperville, IL
Posts: 3,316
Originally Posted by snwbrderphat540
my bad, i was thinking aftermarket boost guage, i forgot the Z32's boost guage actually has NUMBERS on it stock and not just little pictures like most stock boost guages, i officially apologize then. guess its been a while since ive even seen teh inside of a z32 let alone a TT one....
Bingo.

Aftermarket gauges have different ranges for the tick-marks when they convert from one measurement (PSI) to another (inHg), like this...



Since the gauge on the TT is equally spaced on both sides and numbered equally, it's basically reading negative psi. As we've discussed, that's not a good way to read vacuum, but, as I also said, when discussing the direct relationship between boost/vacuum and fuel pressure, knowing the vacuum in psi makes it easier to see.
ZLover4Life is offline  
Old 06-19-2007, 04:51 PM
  #46  
Jack Of All Trades
 
CanyonCarver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Acton, California
Posts: 2,296
All I know is that vacuum readings at idle will be ~18-22 in-hg. You can convert between in-hg & psi, and the metric system all that you want, You won't have 40 in-hg vacuum tho.
CanyonCarver is offline  
Old 06-19-2007, 06:04 PM
  #47  
Registered User
 
Goofyz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Ohio
Posts: 459
wait a minute

when they do the comparison of those 4 vacuums late night on TV with the blue water in the columns that last one gets way more than 40 inch of Blue water... which as everyone knows is way prettier than mercury and when it freezes sometimes falls from airplanes which makes it airborne...try that with mercury.
Goofyz is offline  
Old 06-20-2007, 12:04 AM
  #48  
Encyclopedic Knowledge
 
ZLover4Life's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Naperville, IL
Posts: 3,316
Originally Posted by CanyonCarver
All I know is that vacuum readings at idle will be ~18-22 in-hg. You can convert between in-hg & psi, and the metric system all that you want, You won't have 40 in-hg vacuum tho.
I stand corrected... your agreement with Eric made me wonder if I might be wrong, so I dug up Ash's 6 P's post and, you're right, -22 to -18 inHg (not psi) is a proper vacuum reading at idle. This is approximately -10psi, which means at idle the car should measure about 35psi of fuel pressure (the difference between vacuum/boost and fuel pressure must be about 45psi... I remembered 45 was the number, just forgot that it was the difference between the two). That's what I get for not touching a fuel system in 3 years...

And Eric, the stock TT boost gauge does read in psi only, but only goes to -14 and never reaches that... so it does read about -10psi.

For anyone who wants to read...
http://www.twinturbo.net/net/viewmsg...&msg_id=922678
ZLover4Life is offline  
Old 06-20-2007, 12:42 AM
  #49  
Über User
 
snwbrderphat540's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: lemont, Illinois
Posts: 9,532
yeah while i cant doubt your knowledge on your own stock boost guage, when you weresaying those average numbers for vacumme, i was like.... uhhhh, i swear 15-20 in HG was standard not that in PSI.... but w/e that still doesnt do anything for this guys fuel problem nor my ignorance to the TT guage reading in PSI. lol...
snwbrderphat540 is offline  
Old 06-20-2007, 07:56 PM
  #50  
Registered User
 
91zxtt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Gerber, CA
Posts: 3,672
What's funny is up until just now, I had never noticed the in-hg on the left side of my boost gauge....I just saw the psi on the right side and figured that was what it was being measured in. I'm lame... ..thanks Eric for pointing that out. That makes me feel much better.
91zxtt is offline  


Quick Reply: my z is getting way to much fuel



All times are GMT -7. The time now is 01:06 PM.