Front Clip Or Engine???
#3
Yeah thats what I say. Why buy a car then pay for something that you're not completely sure about when you can get the same thing alright completely, no assembly required, and, well for the most part, know what condition its in?
#9
Originally Posted by Antoine de Saint-Exuper
Perfection is achieved, not when there is nothing more to add, but when there is nothing left to take away.
Might be why the 350 and 370 don't have turbos.
Don't get me wrong. I'm not anti-turbo. I just don't like them
#10
They don't have turbos solely because Nissan wanted to keep the cost down to get back to the roots of the every-man's sports car. Porsche, Ferrari, Bugatti, etc all still use turbos. As does the Nissan GTR, which (to my dismay) is Nissan's flagship.
#11
Heheh. Yeah, I knew as soon as I typed that the GTR was the argument against. But my argument against that argument is that the GTR motor was built as well as could be that turbos became necessary to break the NA limit. It is my opinion that too many cars rely on turbo chargers instead of mechanical excellence.
#12
The fact that your NA will never see 300hp without nitrous or a non-street-legal build is a testament to the fact that the VG30 couldn't be made more powerful while meeting emissions standards without forced induction.
Think your counter-arguments through a bit more, next time... that was way to obvious and easy to respond to. lol
Think your counter-arguments through a bit more, next time... that was way to obvious and easy to respond to. lol
#16
My 95 is pristine as they come... its definitely getting the swap by way of front clip. Also keep in mind the N/A 300zx comes with less weight than the Twin turbo With NO hicas which most real drivers remove anyway.
#18
#19
Top reasons for removing HICAS:
1) You're a moron who thinks they're a professional driver and HICAS "cramps your style." (I've seldom heard a skilled driver badmouth the system, they just tend to prefer the weight savings and taller NA gear.)
2) Legitimate weight savings. (By legitimate, I don't mean they removed HICAS and nothing else; I mean these people are building track-use cars. To remove HICAS and only a few other things is utterly retarded, as it's removing weight from the wrong end - the car is front heavy, and you want to make the rear lighter? Dumb.)
3) Your HICAS system was malfunctioning. (Which is rare.)
I've left HICAS on both my Twin Turbos, and my next Twin Turbo will also still have HICAS. The smart people who build street cars leave HICAS. The morons who build street cars and the hardcore track racers are the ones who remove it - the former being FAR more common.
Considering the 240Z, 260Z, 280Z, 350Z, and 370Z are all naturally aspirated, I'd say FI isn't the norm in the Z world. I'd also say that anybody whose screen name starts with 2J probably belongs on SupraForums...
Last edited by ZLover4Life; 11-26-2010 at 05:35 PM.
#21
I'm on the fence with HICAS, I love it when it works correctly, but I hate it when I have to deal with leaks. I think it's more of you're personal preference if you want to remove it or not regardless of the reason. I removed the one on my sisters TT because I didn't want to deal with fixing it and I feel it makes the car more predictable without it.
But removing it for the weight saving (maybe 30 at the most) is just kinda stupid, but removing it because you don't like it or don't want it, or want to deal with fixing it doesn't make you a moron, it doesn't make you anything all it makes you is a z32 owner with an opinion on their car and how it should be.
But removing it for the weight saving (maybe 30 at the most) is just kinda stupid, but removing it because you don't like it or don't want it, or want to deal with fixing it doesn't make you a moron, it doesn't make you anything all it makes you is a z32 owner with an opinion on their car and how it should be.
#23
I encourage you to try (I'm all about advancement of our technology), but it's never been done... and others have tried. (Google it... found posts by people asking "how can I get 300hp out of my NA without converting to TT?" and the responses are like "pray"... I found it amusing.)
Here's the only 300rwhp NA I've ever heard of:
... it's a drag car, and clearly not street legal.
#24
I won't butcher the poor thing.
I'll see what I can do and post the results pass or fail.
It'll be a while. I have a little one now and she sucks up more money than my cars ever did.
Edit:
Oh and I'm not going to pretend this is economical. It's cheaper to buy a faster can than to make any car faster. Those factory engineers usually know what they're doing.
I know well ahead of time it'll cost more than a TT with mods to get even close to 300hp.
This will be the kind of project I constantly tried to talk customers out of doing. I just want to see if I can do it.
To anyone else reading if you want a 300hp Z32 just get a TT.
I'll see what I can do and post the results pass or fail.
It'll be a while. I have a little one now and she sucks up more money than my cars ever did.
Edit:
Oh and I'm not going to pretend this is economical. It's cheaper to buy a faster can than to make any car faster. Those factory engineers usually know what they're doing.
I know well ahead of time it'll cost more than a TT with mods to get even close to 300hp.
This will be the kind of project I constantly tried to talk customers out of doing. I just want to see if I can do it.
To anyone else reading if you want a 300hp Z32 just get a TT.
Last edited by jverz; 11-28-2010 at 07:10 AM. Reason: Follow up
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Bookmarks