280ZX (S130) Forums Dedicated to 79-83 ZCars

Stock Ride Height??

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Aug 10, 2005 | 06:41 PM
  #1  
colin_barnes's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 58
From: NC
Stock Ride Height??

Hello all,

I need some advice. I have just installed new front and rear springs on my '83 280zx. Also installed new KYB struts on front and rear. The rear seems too high. The front seems to be an acceptable height, though it is slightly higher than it was. I had previously installed new Energy Suspension urethane bushings as well. When the car had the stock springs on it, it sat pretty much level front to rear though it had the familiar dip in the rear when you changed gears or took off from a stop. Now my car sits higher in the rear - about 2.5 inches higher. Is this supposed to be?? The springs fit just fine once installed. I had lowered springs on it a number of years ago and the stance was of course lower - by about 2 inches, but the ride was so rough that the car was bottoming out on the frame when I hit bumps or pot holes. That is why I wanted to go back with the stock ride height ones... The car handles great and there is no dip when taking off at all. It just looks funny to me..

You guys got any suggestions??

Thanks,
Old Aug 10, 2005 | 07:34 PM
  #2  
s/cL3.0's Avatar
Bleach is my Hero
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,293
The rear is definetly supposed to be higher than the front, I dont know bout 2 inches though
Old Aug 10, 2005 | 11:16 PM
  #3  
RodMoyes's Avatar
Doesn't post much...
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 3,617
From: Escondido (San Diego) California
That is the normal stance for a stock 280ZX with new springs. If you look at promo adds for the cars when they were new, you'll see that the rear sits up pretty high. The rear springs tend to settle/sag faster than the fronts... so over time the car levels out or even sags in the rear. I've seen plenty of 280ZX's that looked like they had a couple bags of cement in the hatch area because the rear end sat so low.

Rod.
Old Aug 11, 2005 | 03:41 AM
  #4  
WildmaN's Avatar
More Than Meets The Eye
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 5,120
From: Mesa, Az
Originally Posted by RodMoyes
That is the normal stance for a stock 280ZX with new springs. If you look at promo adds for the cars when they were new, you'll see that the rear sits up pretty high. The rear springs tend to settle/sag faster than the fronts... so over time the car levels out or even sags in the rear. I've seen plenty of 280ZX's that looked like they had a couple bags of cement in the hatch area because the rear end sat so low.

Rod.
Ditto man, both of my Zx's are victims of rear end sag!!
Old Aug 11, 2005 | 06:32 AM
  #5  
colin_barnes's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 58
From: NC
Thanks Guys,

I sort of thought that it may supposed to be that way but was not sure. The lowered springs that I had on it made the car sit level, but lower of course.. I appreciate your comments..
Old Aug 11, 2005 | 07:37 AM
  #6  
Bleach's Avatar
The Evil Twin
 
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 9,296
From: Seattle, WA
when you put new control arm bushings in, keep them loose. Then lower the car onto the ground. Once the car has settled, tighten them up. If you tighten them first, they'll keep the car raised and eventually the stress on the bushing will tear it internally.
Old Aug 11, 2005 | 06:33 PM
  #7  
colin_barnes's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 58
From: NC
Thanks for the info Bleach. I appreciate it.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Rupe
300ZX (Z32) Brakes, Wheels, Suspension and Chassis
1
Jun 8, 2012 08:22 PM
ryn004
280ZX (S130) Forums
5
Oct 3, 2011 03:36 PM
Groover
350Z (Z33) Forums
0
May 26, 2005 05:50 AM
J.Larr
280ZX (S130) Forums
1
Aug 12, 2004 11:25 AM
J.Larr
280ZX Brakes, Wheels, Suspension and Chassis
0
Aug 12, 2004 05:22 AM




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:59 PM.