Probably the biggest retard I have ever seen....
12-21-2005, 06:12 PM
#1
Registered User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 777
Probably the biggest retard I have ever seen....
http://videos.streetfire.net/Player....CE38C2D1D7&p=0
I just found this on street fire and had to post it, I thought this Buick Skylark "GTR" I saw was bad but this is worse!
I just found this on street fire and had to post it, I thought this Buick Skylark "GTR" I saw was bad but this is worse!
12-21-2005, 08:56 PM
#5
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Temecula, CA
Posts: 5,485
That is some of the funniest ish I have ever seen. It's right up there with the Gallo 12 in a Skyline or double clutching in a drag race 
Only this was real life at a car show no less 
It's better to look stupid then to look STUPID. Retard.
Only this was real life at a car show no less It's better to look stupid then to look STUPID. Retard.
12-22-2005, 09:05 AM
#8
Registered User
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: z junk yard
Posts: 1,271
lol yea ok and i got a v-20 engine 20 pistions and 12 vavles in each piston.. lol ive seen some dumb asses, but that guy must take the cake.. ( and i meen the hole cake ) i would of slaped him but hes kinda big... lol
12-22-2005, 11:59 AM
#11
Super Siver & Black Stud
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Hayward Ca
Posts: 1,526
i dont think its AWD... looks more like understeer.. supposedly this car is going to be in the next fast and furious movie... heres the the link on the forum where i got the pics from
http://hotrodhomepage.com/?p=68
http://hotrodhomepage.com/?p=68
12-22-2005, 06:38 PM
#18
Registered User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 777
That mustang is pretty cool I guess but I don't realy see the point. It makes sense to put and RB in something like a 240Z because it's small light car. But why put the motor into a car that is big and heavy and the exhaust doesn't realy fit that car to say the least. But I am kind of biased because I have never really liked most Mustangs.
12-22-2005, 08:55 PM
#20
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Temecula, CA
Posts: 5,485
Yeah the 65-68's were fairly light cars. With the 65-66's being the lighter of the models. 69 saw some major girth added and it just went up from there until the Mustang II days (shudder). But yeah, those old Stangs are not big heavy machines. I had a 65 and it was quite nimble. They were actually quite a bit smaller than other muscle cars of the day. I seriously doubt the first gens tipped the scales more than the S130. The second gen cars (67-68) probably just a few lbs more. Of course with the one above being a second gen car it's still a fairly light weight vehicle.
12-22-2005, 11:24 PM
#21
Registered User
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Posts: 215
Originally Posted by RodMoyes
So the guy with the turbo/rotoary/piston having GT-R Mustang is an obvious poser and moron. The guy with the RB26 in his Mustang is now my HERO!!!! 
Rod.
Rod.
12-22-2005, 11:32 PM
#22
Registered User
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 239
Maybe its just me but the bottom pic Icice put up looks like the chase scene from "Bullit" the movie. Plus its not the same car as in the pics above, no stripes on the hood etc ...and the wheels are much smaller and "torque thrust" like, as compared to the 20's??? on the car in the pics above...but then again...Maybe its just me....
12-23-2005, 11:42 AM
#25
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Temecula, CA
Posts: 5,485
The new ones a heffer. I loved the new styling when they started showing pics and ads of it. And then I saw the car in person. In pics it looks like it should be a much smaller car. But its not, its a big car. It's just too bulky in my opinion. Sure they raised the power levels of the car, but they raised the weight too. I still think it looks really good in pics. Especially that Rousch edition.
