280ZX Performance / Technical Discussions related to Turbo charging, Supercharging, Engine, ECU, exhaust, and etc. performance enhancements.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Your thoughts on V8 swap

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 20, 2005 | 05:18 PM
  #2  
Skully's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 2,906
From: Saskatoon, SK
no toughts but LOTS INFO HERE!!

www.hybridz.org

its made for stuff like that
hope it helps
Old Feb 20, 2005 | 05:22 PM
  #3  
BigEkak1941's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 100
From: Texas
Haven't done it yet, but it's doable. There are sites to get the conversion brackets. You will have to change out the tranie, prob drive shaft & if you really want to get it hot the rear end. One thing to remember the small block Cheve 350 is heaver than the Z engine & you will have to adapt the suspension. However, from the people I have talked to that did it you will have one hot ride. I wish you good luck and be patient.
Old Feb 20, 2005 | 09:11 PM
  #4  
B1nAryVilE's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 74
From: el paso tx
I like the whole thought of american muscle under the car but what i haven't found is a transmission that is standard, all i've seen is the 700R4 transmission and from what i've heard it's only automatic. But if anyone knows better,or of any comparable transmission, let me know, it's the only thing keeping me from putting my small block from my chevy 57' into my car. For the fact that my chevy already has an engine on it's way to production.
-Chuck
Old Feb 20, 2005 | 09:41 PM
  #5  
crazytvrguy280's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 31
From: vegas
ya i think that it is a good thing the chevy is much cheper to work on then th z moter and their is a lot thing you can do but i would put a stick over a auto it is much more fun and it takes less horespower to run then any and you can have fater car
Old Feb 20, 2005 | 11:01 PM
  #6  
dr. buddha's Avatar
Z Extreme Guy
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 673
From: reno nv
i have a sbc convertion(it was totld by a kid driving whil he was drunk) it was a 85 z31. the sbc was awsum in it. i hade a 700r4 in it,some say they would go with a stik for it makes it faster not true auto is just as fast and they are more constent.now on the more fun, maby so. all i can say to you is i hade lots of fun in mine.
Old Feb 21, 2005 | 07:24 PM
  #7  
duckyz's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 903
From: Alameda, CA
eh....to me that defeats the whole point of having a Z car. But if you want an "easy" way to go fast in a straight line, go for it. Me, I like the twisties!
Old Feb 26, 2005 | 03:42 PM
  #8  
Nihilanthic's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 4
Sorry if I offend purists here, but Believe it or not v8s are not that heavy and are smaller in one dimension than the old straight-6 in there. Its 4 long, not 6 long. Its just 2 wide... (to use very general terms here)

Also, being shorter, its easily mounted totally behind the front axle, shifting the weight backwards a bit, and on top of that, LS1/LS2/LS6/LS7 v8s are all aluminum and signifigantly lighter than the stock I-6 engine.

IIRC, a SBC is about the same as the I-6, and a SBF is a little less. Going with aluminum heads or intake manifolds, etc can ligthen it. you can also relocate the battery, get a lighter hood... Its very VERY easy to have a TAIL heavy Z car with the v8 swap.

So, with the weight being essentially the SAME, but with it all behind the front axle making it in the middle of the car, I'm sure its apparent the handling is basically the same, if not slightly better. :P

That not withstanding, you now have a engine thats cheaper to work on, very reliable, and with MUCH more potential than ANY straight 6 will ever have by virtue of its displacement. Plus, for any power out of any L6/RB26/SR20, a v8 can match it with more reliability and driveability. As in low end torque and throttle responce.

I'm sure a few ricers might be pissed off because I dared to put down the alimightly skyline engine, but whatever. Its only 2.6 liters of displacement, pushes weight front with how long it is, suffers crank vibration from how long it is, and simply doesnt have the potential of a turbocharged or supercharged v8. Oh, and v8s and parts for them are a dime a dozen here. RB26s were never sold here, and thus getting parts might be expensive and time consuming.

BTW, the reason I'm here is because I plan on swappinga v8 into a 280ZX soon
Old Feb 27, 2005 | 11:20 PM
  #10  
Heat Rave R's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 1,075
From: Bay Area, CA
Originally Posted by Nihilanthic
Also, being shorter, its easily mounted totally behind the front axle
I'm sorry, but that's not quite correct. For it to be totally behind the front axle, the V8 would have to about 17" long and touching the firewall!

Last edited by Heat Rave R; Feb 27, 2005 at 11:23 PM.
Old Feb 27, 2005 | 11:20 PM
  #11  
Nihilanthic's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 4
Damn straight I did! ITS HUGE.

For a engine of its (relatively) small displacement its external dimensions are unbeliveably gargantuine. My HTTP skills suck, so heres a link to a pic of a 302 ci pushrod engine compared to the 4.6 liter DOHC engine: [pic]

Displacement and external size are two different things. Displacement is how far the swept area of the pistion head is - the cylindrical area defined by its stroke and bore. In something like a small block chevy, its very efficient and using the most of its available size to make it. Theres also nearly 50 years worth of tricks and expertiese to make power out of them. With NA, you can go MUCH farther than a sub 3000 lb z car would need on the street - and with FI you can go so much farther.

I'd *MUCH* rather have a *MUCH* smaller pushrod engine thats well tuned, fits in there, and isnt expensive as hell, weighs less, is cheaper but still makes the power. A SBC would fit inside of that! Also, SBC's go up to 7 liters of displacement... a 427.

DOHC sure is nice, but adds size, weight, and price, and its not as effective "bang for buck" as pushrods are. If you wanna spend more money, and get less performance, go right ahead. Just good luck on shoehorning that monstrousity into a Z car, and for that matter, paying big bucks for parts. FI is the way people go on those engines because tuning it NA and changing cams requires... 4 new cams.

With Pushrods I can change lift with my rocker arms, I only need to change *ONE* cam to do anything with it, and while I dont have 4 valves per cylinder, I still get plenty of headflow and no restrictions in sight.
Old Feb 27, 2005 | 11:21 PM
  #12  
Nihilanthic's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 4
Originally Posted by Heat Rave R
I'm sorry, but that's not quite correct. I don't think I've ever seen a V8 that's only 17" long.
I've seen a picutre of a v8 in a Z car and the block was behind the struts. The ACCESSORIES werent, but the bock was.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
10secondimports
300ZX (Z31) Forums
3
Apr 24, 2015 11:25 AM
530Z
240Z, 260Z, 280Z V8 Swaps
2
Nov 14, 2012 07:56 AM
wake2wake21
280ZX Performance / Technical
15
Mar 26, 2011 07:16 AM
RodMoyes
280ZX (S130) Forums
42
Mar 21, 2006 06:38 PM
BJ BISIG
280ZX Brakes, Wheels, Suspension and Chassis
3
Mar 8, 2005 04:21 AM




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 08:53 PM.