280ZX Performance / Technical Discussions related to Turbo charging, Supercharging, Engine, ECU, exhaust, and etc. performance enhancements.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

N42 Intake

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old Feb 20, 2008 | 10:21 AM
  #1  
CWHammer's Avatar
Thread Starter
Under My Car... brb
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 386
N42 Intake

Is there a valid reason to go to an N42 non-egr intake? Other than it looks really cool. If I did, what would it do to the emissions circuit of my '83 N/A?
Old Feb 20, 2008 | 10:28 AM
  #2  
snwbrderphat540's Avatar
Über User
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 9,532
From: lemont, Illinois
it would make emmissions harder to pass and no performance help at all.
Old Feb 20, 2008 | 02:16 PM
  #3  
duowing's Avatar
NisTuner
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 2,800
From: Cleveland, Ohio
It really wouldn't do anything as there really isn't an emissions circuit. You'd just be eliminating the EGR valve, which would require just plugging off a vacuum line and the EGR tube. Unless you have to go through an under hood inspection the EGR valve not being there won't cause you to fail emissions. I passed emissions with my Turbo ZX with a plugged off EGR, incorrectly hooked up AAC, etc and had no problems. The readings didn't differ much from my N/A 280ZX when it was emissions tested.
Old Feb 20, 2008 | 04:00 PM
  #4  
CWHammer's Avatar
Thread Starter
Under My Car... brb
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 386
Here in MI there is no emissions to pass. Would it help to dissipate the heat from the exhaust and keep the intake air cooler?
Old Feb 20, 2008 | 08:23 PM
  #5  
snwbrderphat540's Avatar
Über User
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 9,532
From: lemont, Illinois
no. like i said, its just MUCH cleaner. if you have a webbed (theres webbing between the intake runners) intake, the N42 isnt webbed so that MIGHT help dissipate heat. a lil
Old Feb 21, 2008 | 01:10 PM
  #6  
duowing's Avatar
NisTuner
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 2,800
From: Cleveland, Ohio
If there is a gain from removing the EGR, it's pretty much unnoticeable. If anything you're losing just a tiny bit of gas mileage as now you're missing out on that tiny extra bit of unburned fuel that gets recirculated. If anything I liked getting rid of the EGR simply because it was one less thing to get stuck open or go bad.
Old Feb 21, 2008 | 09:05 PM
  #7  
CWHammer's Avatar
Thread Starter
Under My Car... brb
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 386
I can dig that. I'll watch it and see where the price goes and decide from there.
Old Feb 21, 2008 | 09:43 PM
  #8  
snwbrderphat540's Avatar
Über User
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 9,532
From: lemont, Illinois
i recomend not paying anything over 100 dollars.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
dhp123166
FS: 240Z,260Z,280Z & 280ZX (70-83)
0
Jul 22, 2009 12:12 PM
dag88
350Z (Z33) Forums
0
Apr 14, 2009 07:27 PM
justinmy300z
300ZX (Z32) Performance / Technical
54
Feb 12, 2006 11:01 PM
280ZX_AV8R
280ZX Performance / Technical
53
Jun 17, 2005 06:47 PM
thomas schuchat
240Z, 260Z, 280Z (S30) Forums
0
Apr 17, 2003 11:26 AM




All times are GMT -7. The time now is 09:00 PM.